Open this publication in new window or tab >>2020 (English)In: Journal of Small Business Strategy, ISSN 1081-8510, E-ISSN 2380-1751, Vol. 30, no 1, p. 68-82Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
The objective of this paper is to build a model of how tacit knowing is externalised and becomes reflected external knowledge.
Knowledge Management (Nonaka, 1991, 1994; Nonaka, Toyama and Konno, 2000) is an important field in Business Administration. Based on the model provided by Nonaka and his colleagues, researchers and practitioners have fallen into the pipe dream that employees’ tacit knowledge can be coded and canned in computers (structural capital), eventually leading to the enterprise without humans. Earlier critics (Gourlay, 2002, 2006; Gourlay and Nurse, 2005, Grant, 2007; Author 1, 2016a, 2019) of the knowledge management paradigm have shown that it does not understand Polanyi’s concept tacit knowing and that it is much more complicated to “externalize” such knowing than presumed by KM. The understanding in extant management literature of this process has been very problematic.
Building on concepts in philosophy, psychology, pedagogics, organizational science, and engineering, a model is built and exemplified. This paper develops a theoretical framework for how tacit knowing can be externalized, what is required for such an externalization, and discusses the problems in such externalization, limiting it.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Middle Tennessee State University, 2020
Keywords
Tacit knowing, externalization, reflected knowledge, boundary objects
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31246 (URN)2-s2.0-85079873080 (Scopus ID)
2019-12-102019-12-102024-04-01Bibliographically approved