hig.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound?: A replication study
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för byggnadsteknik, energisystem och miljövetenskap, Miljövetenskap. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Memory & Cognition, ISSN 0090-502X, E-ISSN 1532-5946, Vol. 48, nr 1, s. 145-157Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139-144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139-144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Psychonomic Society , 2020. Vol. 48, nr 1, s. 145-157
Emneord [en]
Auditory distraction, Individual differences, Replication, Serial recall
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-30572DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8ISI: 000511938900011PubMedID: 31363999Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078684170OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-30572DiVA, id: diva2:1345327
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-08-23 Laget: 2019-08-23 Sist oppdatert: 2020-03-02bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Marsh, John E.

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Marsh, John E.
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Memory & Cognition

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 34 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf