hig.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Realising the potential of natural water retention measures in catchment flood management: Trade-offs and matching interests
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för utbildning och ekonomi, Avdelningen för ekonomi, Nationalekonomi. Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Flood Risk Management, ISSN 1753-318X, E-ISSN 1753-318X, Vol. 11, nr 1 (SI), s. 76-84Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Natural water retention measures (NWRM) are a multifunctional form of green infrastructure that can play an important role in catchment-scale flood risk management. While green infrastructure based on natural processes is increasingly recognised as being complementary to traditional flood control strategies based on grey infrastructure in urban areas, there are a number of outstanding challenges with their widespread uptake. At a catchment scale, it is widely accepted that NWRM in upstream areas based on the concept of ’keeping the rain where it falls’ can help reduce the risk of downstream flooding by enhancing or restoring natural hydrological processes including interception, evapotranspiration, infiltration, and ponding. However, both the magnitude of flood risk reduction and the institutional structures needed for widespread uptake of NWRM are inadequately understood. Implementing NWRM can involve trade-offs, especially in agricultural areas. Measures based on drainage management and short rotation forestry may help ’keep the rain where it falls’ but can result in foregone farm income. To identify situations where the implementation of NWRM may be warranted, an improved understanding of the likely reductions in downstream urban flood risk, the required institutional structures for risk management and transfer, and mutually acceptable farm compensation schemes are all needed.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2018. Vol. 11, nr 1 (SI), s. 76-84
Emneord [en]
Digital terrain modelling; Economic assessment; Flood mitigation
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-22727DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12269ISI: 000428435400009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84989360044OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-22727DiVA, id: diva2:1045799
Prosjekter
MISTRA Future Forests programme
Forskningsfinansiär
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental ResearchTilgjengelig fra: 2016-11-10 Laget: 2016-11-10 Sist oppdatert: 2018-06-04bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Collentine, Dennis

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Collentine, Dennis
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Flood Risk Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 291 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf