hig.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Negative Footprint Illusion in Environmental Impact Estimates
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för byggnadsteknik, energisystem och miljövetenskap, Miljövetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-8442-8324
2020 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

A major part of anthropogenic climate change is due to everyday human behavior, such as transportation, food and energy consumption. As a result, it has been argued that many barriers for mitigating climate change are psychological in nature. For example, people’s decisions and behaviors are subject to heuristics and biases which sometime harm our decisions. The benchmark of the present thesis is the finding that people believe that adding environmentally friendly items to a set of conventional items reduces the impact of the whole set. This phenomenon has been coined a negative footprint illusion (NFI). How robust is this effect, is it generalizable across judgmental dimensions and what is the mechanism that underpins the effect? This thesis concerns these three questions. Paper 1 found support for the assumption that an averaging bias underpins the NFI. On this view, the NFI appears because people intuitively respond with the average of the ‘vices’ (the unfriendly objects) and ‘virtues’ (the more environmentally friendly objects) in the combined set of objects. Paper 2 demonstrated that the NFI is insensitive to some levels of expertise. Furthermore, Paper 2 also reported the first demonstration of the NFI in the context of a within-participants design. Paper 3 found that a NFI can also be demonstrated in the context of atmospheric CO2 concentration estimates. Paper 3 also reported further evidence for the averaging bias account of the NFI and showed that the effect is at least insensitive to some variations in the framing of the problem posed to the participants. Paper 4 demonstrated that the NFI can be eliminated by priming a summative mindset before requesting participants to make the environmental impact estimates. Taken together, this thesis shows that the NFI is a robust phenomenon that can be found across various to-be-estimated stimulus materials, it appears to be underpinned by an averaging bias but can be cognitively controlled in certain conditions.

Abstract [sv]

Klimatförändringarna påverkas till stor del av mänskliga beteenden, till exempel transport, mat- och energikonsumtion. Därför argumenterar ett flertal forskare för att flera barriärer för att bromsa klimatförändringarna är av psykologisk natur, snarare än teknologisk. Klimatförändringarna är till exempel beroende av hur vi människor fattar beslut, vilka i sin tur påverkas av heuristiker och kognitiva snedvridningar som ibland vilseleder vårt beslutsfattande. Den här avhandlingen studerar ett fenomen som innebär att människor ofta tror att om man lägger till ett miljövänligt objekt till en samling konventionella objekt minskar det totala koldioxidavtrycket totalt sett, ett fenomen som kallas för ”den negativa fotavtrycksillusionen” (NFI). Hur robust är den här effekten, kan den generaliseras till andra bedömningsdimensioner och vilken mekanism ger upphov till effekten? Avhandlingen behandlar dessa frågor. Artikel 1 ger stöd för att en genomsnittsprocess orsakar NFI. Mer specifikt, NFI uppstår för att människor intuitivt svarar med genomsnittet av de icke miljövänliga objekten tillsammans med de miljövänliga objekten. Artikel 2 visade att NFI är relativt okänslig för expertis och att illusionen uppstår även när människor kan jämföra sina estimat av olika objektsamlingar. Artikel 3 fann att NFI även kan uppstå i en kontext där deltagarna ombeds skatta den atmosfäriska koldioxidkoncentrationen. Artikel 3 gav också ytterligare stöd för att en genomsnittsprocess ger upphov till illusionen och demonstrerade att illusionen åtminstone till del är okänslig för hur bedömningsproblemen är presenterade för deltagarna. Artikel 4 visade att NFI kan elimineras genom att prima ett additivt tankesätt innan deltagarna gör bedömningen. Avhandlingen visar sammanfattningsvis att NFI är ett robust fenomen som uppstår för flera stimulusmaterial, att en genomsnittsprocess tycks ge upphov till NFI och demonstrerar att effekten kan kontrolleras kognitivt i vissa situationer.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Gävle: Gävle University Press , 2020. , s. 40
Serie
Doctoral thesis ; 14
Emneord [en]
The negative footprint illusion, averaging bias, environmental impact estimates, decision-making, climate change
Emneord [sv]
Den negativa fotavtryckillusionen, genomsnittsprocess, miljöpåverkan, beslutsfattande, klimatförändringarna
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
inget Strategiskt forskningsområde (SFO)
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31920ISBN: 978-91-88145-42-0 (tryckt)ISBN: 978-91-88145-43-7 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-31920DiVA, id: diva2:1394699
Disputas
2020-04-22, 12:108, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, 13:00 (svensk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-04-01 Laget: 2020-02-19 Sist oppdatert: 2020-11-23bibliografisk kontrollert
Delarbeid
1. Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates: Evidence from the negative footprint illusion
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates: Evidence from the negative footprint illusion
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Environmental Psychology, ISSN 0272-4944, E-ISSN 1522-9610, Vol. 55, s. 48-52Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper we argue that unsustainable behaviors often stem from a common averaging bias when people estimate the environmental impact of a set of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects or actions. In Experiment 1, we show that people believe that the total carbon footprint of a category of items (a community of buildings in this case) is lower, rather than higher, when environmentally friendly (“green” buildings) items are added to the category, a negative footprint illusion. Experiment 2 showed  that the carbon footprint estimate assigned to a category with a mix of environmentally friendly and less friendly objects (“green” and conventional  buildings) is the average of its subsets (the “green” buildings and the  conventional buildings, respectively), an averaging bias. A similar averaging  process may underpin estimates of the environmental impact of people's own actions, explaining why people believe that environmentally friendly actions can compensate for less friendly actions.

Emneord
“Green” buildings, Averaging bias Carbon footprint, The negative footprint illusion
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Hållbar stadsutveckling
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-25882 (URN)10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.005 (DOI)000428489200006 ()2-s2.0-85038968856 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-12-20 Laget: 2017-12-20 Sist oppdatert: 2022-09-09bibliografisk kontrollert
2. When A+B < A: Cognitive bias in experts' judgment of environmental impact
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>When A+B < A: Cognitive bias in experts' judgment of environmental impact
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 9, artikkel-id 823Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

When ‘environmentally friendly’ items are added to a set of conventional items, people report that the total set will have a lower environmental impact even though the actual impact increases. One hypothesis is that this “negative footprint illusion” arises because people, who are susceptible to the illusion, lack necessary knowledge of the item’s actual environmental impact, perhaps coupled with a lack of mathematical skills. The study reported here addressed this hypothesis by recruiting participants (‘experts’) from a master’s program in energy systems, who thus have bachelor degrees in energy-related fields including academic training in mathematics. They were asked to estimate the number of trees needed to compensate for the environmental burden of two sets of buildings: One set of 150 buildings with conventional energy ratings and one set including the same 150 buildings but also 50 ‘green’ (energy-efficient) buildings. The experts reported that less trees were needed to compensate for the set with 150 conventional and 50 ‘green’ buildings compared to the set with only the 150 conventional buildings. This negative footprint illusion was as large in magnitude for the experts as it was for a group of novices without academic training in energy-related fields. We conclude that people are not immune to the negative footprint illusion even when they have the knowledge necessary to make accurate judgments.

Emneord
averaging bias, Climate Change, Environmental impact, Judgment, Negative footprint illusion
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Hållbar stadsutveckling
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26530 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00823 (DOI)000433393500002 ()29896142 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85047665372 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-05-02 Laget: 2018-05-02 Sist oppdatert: 2022-02-10bibliografisk kontrollert
3. Deceptive sustainability: Cognitive bias in people's judgment of the benefits of CO2 emission cuts
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Deceptive sustainability: Cognitive bias in people's judgment of the benefits of CO2 emission cuts
Vise andre…
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Environmental Psychology, ISSN 0272-4944, E-ISSN 1522-9610, Vol. 64, s. 48-55Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

People's beliefs in the actions necessary to reduce anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are important to public policy acceptability. The current paper addressed beliefs concerning how periods of small emission cuts contribute to the total CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, by asking participants to rate the atmospheric CO2 concentration for various time periods and emission rates. The participants thought that a time period with higher emission rates combined with a period of lower emission rates generates less atmospheric CO2 in total, compared to the period with high emission rates alone – demonstrating a negative footprint illusion (Study 1). The participants appeared to base their CO2 estimates on the average, rather than on the accumulated sum, of the two periods' emissions – i.e. an averaging bias (Study 2). Moreover, the effect was robust to the wordings of the problem presented to the participants (Study 3). Together, these studies suggest that the averaging bias makes people exaggerate the benefits of small emission cuts. The averaging bias could make people willing to accept policies that reduce emission rates although insufficiently to alleviate global warming.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2019
Emneord
Climate change; Global warming; Averaging bias; Negative footprint illusion
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Hållbar stadsutveckling
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-29596 (URN)10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.005 (DOI)000484869600006 ()2-s2.0-85066452463 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-05-24 Laget: 2019-05-24 Sist oppdatert: 2024-05-21bibliografisk kontrollert
4. Eliminating the Negative Footprint Illusion by Fostering a Summative Mindset using a Transfer Paradigm
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Eliminating the Negative Footprint Illusion by Fostering a Summative Mindset using a Transfer Paradigm
(engelsk)Manuskript (preprint) (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

People’s belief that an environmentally friendly item that is added to a set of conventional items has the ability to reduce the total environmental impact of these items could lead to unwanted environmental consequences. An averaging bias seems to underpin this negative footprint illusion: people make their estimates based on the average of the environmental impact produced by the items rather than their accumulative sum. We report a study using a problem-solving transfer paradigm to explore if this preoccupation to think in terms of an average can be eliminated by fostering a summative mindset. The results demonstrate that, participants can correctly estimate that environmental impact will increase when a “green” car is added to a set of petrol cars, but only when this task is preceded by a task that engenders a summation judgment. Our evidence indicates that the negative footprint illusion can be tempered by problem-solving transfer whereby a primed concept (summation) is used adaptively on subsequent judgments, thereby correcting for bias in environmental judgments.    

Emneord
negative footprint illusion; averaging bias; problem-solving transfer; priming
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31919 (URN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-02-19 Laget: 2020-02-19 Sist oppdatert: 2022-09-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(1212 kB)925 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 1212 kBChecksum SHA-512
72ff7189599cc045858d4bf2c10c8bf9fc36854fb8c74e886eba6441f7ac9192f9800fa37a1da20d9c3010db2dfd7401e878c7d7af3422cc00165aabcddd146b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Person

Holmgren, Mattias

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Holmgren, Mattias
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 927 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1276 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf