hig.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Statistical performance of observational work sampling for assessment of categorical exposure variables: A simulation approach illustrated using PATH data
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för hälsa och arbetsliv, Avdelningen för arbets- och folkhälsovetenskap, Arbetshälsovetenskap. Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1443-6211
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för hälsa och arbetsliv, Avdelningen för arbets- och folkhälsovetenskap, Arbetshälsovetenskap. Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-2939-0236
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för hälsa och arbetsliv, Avdelningen för arbets- och folkhälsovetenskap, Arbetshälsovetenskap. Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning. Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
2014 (engelsk)Inngår i: Annals of Occupational Hygiene, ISSN 0003-4878, E-ISSN 1475-3162, Vol. 58, nr 3, s. 294-316Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives. Observational work sampling is often used in occupational studies to assess categorical biomechanical exposures and occurrence of specific work tasks. The statistical performance of data obtained by work sampling is, however, not well understood, impeding informed measurement strategy design. The purpose of this study was to develop a procedure for assessing the statistical properties of work sampling strategies evaluating categorical exposure variables, and to illustrate the usefulness of this procedure to examine bias and precision of exposure estimates from samples of different sizes.

Methods. From a parent data set of observations on 10 construction workers performing a single operation, the probabilities were determined for each worker of performing four component tasks and working in four mutually exclusive trunk posture categories (neutral, mild flexion, severe flexion, twisted). Using these probabilities, 5000 simulated data sets were created via probability-based re-sampling for each of six sampling strategies, ranging from 300 to 4500 observations. For each strategy, mean exposure and exposure variability metrics were calculated at both the operation- and task-levels and, for each of these, bias and precision were assessed across the 5000 simulations.

Results. Estimates of exposure variability were substantially more uncertain at all sample sizes than estimates of mean exposures and task proportions. Estimates at small sample sizes were also biased. With only 600 samples, proportions of the different tasks and of working with a neutral trunk posture (the most common) were within 10% of the true target value in at least 80% of all the simulated data sets; rarer exposures required at least 1500 samples. For most task-level mean exposure variables and for all operation- and task-level estimates of exposure variability, performance was low, even with 4500 samples. In general, the precision of mean exposure estimates did not depend on the exposure variability between workers.

Conclusions. The suggested probability-based simulation approach proved to be versatile and generally suitable for assessing bias and precision of data collection strategies using work sampling to estimate categorical data. The approach can be used in both real and hypothetical scenarios, in ergonomics as well as in other areas of occupational epidemiology and intervention research. The reported statistical properties associated with sample size are likely widely relevant to studies using work sampling to assess categorical variables.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2014. Vol. 58, nr 3, s. 294-316
Emneord [en]
epidemiology, ergonomics, precision, statistical efficiency, working postures
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-13691DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met063ISI: 000333046700004PubMedID: 24353010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84896338641OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-13691DiVA, id: diva2:600083
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-1761Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-01-23 Laget: 2013-01-23 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-31bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(727 kB)272 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 727 kBChecksum SHA-512
87b4550352797bdd95a3b7a4eff2bcc88af6752b9ce946d5841e1aed43c6dc706efa16074741ef0f37fcb01f68556e3e657a4b9096b74eabef24be5332747e93
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Mathiassen, Svend ErikJackson, JenniePunnett, Laura

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Mathiassen, Svend ErikJackson, JenniePunnett, Laura
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 282 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1504 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf