hig.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are lumbar repositioning errors larger among patients with chronic low back pain compared with asymptomatic subjects?
Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning. Svenska Rygginstitutet AB, Sundsvall, Sweden; Department of Odontology, Clinical Oral Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning. Southern Lapland Research Department, Vilhelmina, Sweden.
Svenska Rygginstitutet AB, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Högskolan i Gävle, Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning.
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0003-9993, E-ISSN 1532-821X, Vol. 87, nr 9, s. 1170-1176Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To resolve the debate over whether lumbar repositioning acuity is reduced in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) by using a study design and methodology to minimize the effects of potential confounders. DESIGN: A single-blinded, controlled, multigroup comparative study.

SETTING: Vocational rehabilitation center.

PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two patients with CLBP, divided into subgroups based on severity of symptoms and diagnostic characteristics. An age- and sex-matched group (n=31) of healthy subjects were the control. I

NTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured repositioning errors (variable, constant) at 3 positions of the lumbar spine. Subjects were guided to a sitting target posture and asked to perform lumbar flexion before reproducing the target posture. Self-assessed pain, self-efficacy, and functional ability were addressed through questionnaires.

RESULTS: There were no differences in repositioning errors between the patients with CLBP or the subgroups of patients and the control group. We found only weak correlations between the repositioning errors and the self-reported data on functional disability, self-efficacy, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that sensorimotor dysfunctions in CLBP should be evaluated with methods other than repositioning tests in order to generate data relevant to the development of rational diagnostic methods and rehabilitation programs.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2006. Vol. 87, nr 9, s. 1170-1176
Nyckelord [en]
Adult, Case-Control Studies, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Low Back Pain classification diagnosis physiopathology, Lumbosacral Region, Male, Posture, Questionnaires, Rehabilitation Centers, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method
Nationell ämneskategori
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-2750DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.020ISI: 000240407700002PubMedID: 16935050Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33747782886OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-2750DiVA, id: diva2:119412
Tillgänglig från: 2007-11-28 Skapad: 2007-11-28 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-03-28Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Sjölander, PerDjupsjöbacka, Mats

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sjölander, PerDjupsjöbacka, Mats
Av organisationen
Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning
I samma tidskrift
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1092 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf