hig.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
‘Are we to become a gender university?’ Facets of resistance to a gender equality project
Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6898-1285
Department of Ethnology, History of Religions and Gender Studies, Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7108-2275
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Miljöteknik.
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Gender, Work and Organization, ISSN 0968-6673, E-ISSN 1468-0432, Vol. 25, nr 2, s. 127-143Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Gender equality (GE) is something ‘we cannot not want’. Indeed, the pursuit of equal rights, responsibilities and opportunities for all women and men throughout a society freed from gendered oppression is widely visible in recent organizational GE initiatives. In practice, however, GE initiatives often fail in challenging gendered norms and at effecting deep-seated change. In fact, GE measures tend to encounter resistance, with a gap between saying and doing. Using a GE project at a Swedish university, we examined the changing nature of reactions to GE objectives seeking to understand why gender inequality persists in academia. We used ‘resistance’ to identify multiple, complex reactions to the project, focusing on the discursive practices of GE. Focusing our contextual analysis on change and changes in reactions enabled a process-oriented analysis that revealed gaps where change is possible. Thus, we argue that studying change makes it possible to identify points in time where gendered discriminatory norms are more likely to occur. However, analysing discursive practices does not itself lead to change nor to action. Rather, demands for change must start with answering, in a collaborative way, what problem we are trying to solve when we start a new GE project, in order to be relevant to the specific context. Otherwise, GE risks being the captive of consensus politics and gender inequality will persist.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Blackwell Publishing Ltd , 2018. Vol. 25, nr 2, s. 127-143
Nyckelord [en]
academia, gender equality, meritocracy, resistance, gender issue, gender role, human rights, politics, university sector, Sweden
Nationell ämneskategori
Annan samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26746DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12204ISI: 000429418400003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85032180553OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-26746DiVA, id: diva2:1213154
Tillgänglig från: 2018-06-04 Skapad: 2018-06-04 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-06-04Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Hussénius, Anita

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Powell, StinaAh-King, MalinHussénius, Anita
Av organisationen
Miljöteknik
I samma tidskrift
Gender, Work and Organization
Annan samhällsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf