hig.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland,.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2010 (Engelska)Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, ISSN 0355-3140, E-ISSN 1795-990X, Vol. 36, nr 1, s. 3-24Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to identify published observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures in occupational settings and evaluate them with reference to the needs of different users.

Methods: We searched scientific databases and the internet for material from 1965 to September 2008. Methods were included if they were primarily based on the systematic observation of work, the observation target was the human body, and the method was clearly described in the literature. A systematic evaluation procedure was developed to assess concurrent and predictive validity, repeatability, and aspects related to utility. At least two evaluators independently carried out this evaluation.

Results: We identified 30 eligible observational methods. Of these, 19 had been compared with some other method(s), varying from expert evaluation to data obtained from video recordings or through the use of technical instruments. Generally, the observations showed moderate-to-good agreement with the corresponding assessments made from video recordings; agreement was the best for large-scale body postures and work actions. Postures of wrist and hand as well as trunk rotation seemed to be more difficult to observe correctly. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability were reported for 7 and 17 methods, respectively, and were judged mostly to be moderate or good.

Conclusions: With training, observers can reach consistent results on clearly visible body postures and work activities. Many observational tools exist, but none evaluated in this study appeared to be generally superior. When selecting a method, users should define their needs and assess how results will influence decision-making

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2010. Vol. 36, nr 1, s. 3-24
Nyckelord [en]
posture, review, risk assessment, workload
Nationell ämneskategori
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-5814ISI: 000273439100002PubMedID: 19953213Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77949899304OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-5814DiVA, id: diva2:275615
Forskningsfinansiär
Nordiska ministerrådet, 411040 - 70107Tillgänglig från: 2009-11-06 Skapad: 2009-11-06 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-03-13Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

PubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Mathiassen, Svend Erik

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Mathiassen, Svend Erik
Av organisationen
CBFCentrum för belastningsskadeforskning
I samma tidskrift
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1157 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf