hig.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Framework for Detailed Comparison of Building Environmental Assessment Tools
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Teknisk miljövetenskap. KTH, MIljöstrategisk Analys - fms.ORCID-id: marita.wallhagen@hig.se
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Teknisk miljövetenskap. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment,, Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Urban Studies, Environmental Strategies Research - fms.
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Teknisk miljövetenskap.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5661-2917
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Byggnadsteknik.
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: Buildings, ISSN 2075-5309, E-ISSN 2075-5309, Vol. 3, nr 1, s. 39-60Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Understanding how Building Environmental Assessments Tools (BEATs) measure and define “environmental” building is of great interest to many stakeholders, but it is difficult to understand how BEATs relate to each other, as well as to make detailed and systematic tool comparisons. A framework for comparing BEATs is presented in the following which facilitates an understanding and comparison of similarities and differences in terms of structure, content, aggregation, and scope. The framework was tested by comparing three distinctly different assessment tools; LEED-NC v3, Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH), and EcoEffect. Illustrations of the hierarchical structure of the tools gave a clear overview of their structural differences. When using the framework, the analysis showed that all three tools treat issues related to the main assessment categories: Energy and Pollution, Indoor Environment, and Materials and Waste. However, the environmental issues addressed, and the parameters defining the object of study, differ and, subsequently, so do rating, results, categories, issues, input data, aggregation methodology, and weighting. This means that BEATs measure “environmental” building differently and push “environmental” design in different directions. Therefore, tool comparisons are important, and the framework can be used to make these comparisons in a more detailed and systematic way.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Basel, Switzerland: MDPI AG , 2013. Vol. 3, nr 1, s. 39-60
Nyckelord [en]
framework; green building design; sustainable building; environmental assessment tool; LEED; code for sustainable homes; ecoeffect
Nyckelord [sv]
miljöbedömningsmetoder; miljöanpassat byggande; ramverk
Nationell ämneskategori
Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknik Arkitekturteknik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-13885DOI: 10.3390/buildings3010039Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84992234689OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-13885DiVA, id: diva2:608061
Tillgänglig från: 2013-02-26 Skapad: 2013-02-26 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-01-29Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Environmental Assessment Tools for Neighbourhoods and Buildings in relation to Environment, Architecture, and Architects
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Environmental Assessment Tools for Neighbourhoods and Buildings in relation to Environment, Architecture, and Architects
2016 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

This thesis explores Neighbourhood and Building Environmental Assessment Tools’ (NBEATs’) function as assessment tools and decision support, and their relation to environment, architecture and architects. This is done by analysing, testing, and discussing a number of NBEATs (LEED-NC, Code for Sustainable Homes, EcoEffect, LEED-ND, BREEAM-C, and ENSLIC-tool), their manuals and use. Moreover, professionals’ (architects’) self-rated opinions regarding use and knowledge of NBEATs and environmental aspects are surveyed.

Similarities and differences in NBEATs are found regarding: content, structure, weighting and indicators used. Indicators distinguished as procedure, performance and feature are used to varying extents to assess social, environmental and technical aspects. NBEATs relation to environmental sustainability has limitations due to: non-transparency, tradable indicators, relative measures, low criteria levels, limited life cycle perspective, and exclusion of relevant environmental aspects, such as embedded toxic substances, nutrient cycles, land use change, and ecosystem services. Ratings and architecture are influenced by NBEATs in varying ways. Higher criteria levels would probably increase their impact on architecture. Thus more research regarding NBEATs and links to architectural design, theory and practice is welcomed.

There is limited use of NBEATs as decision support in early design phases such as in architectural competitions. Architects rate the importance of environmental aspects high, but few rate their skill in handling environmental aspects high. This calls for increasing knowledge and know-how of environmental strategies and solutions among architects and adaptation of NBEATs to early design processes. The values NBEATs reflect and the values we want them to create is also important. To support ‘environmental’ architecture, an increased socio-eco-technological system perspective is put forward, and other measures besides NBEATs are needed.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2016. s. 112
Serie
TRITA-INFRA-FMS-PHD ; 2016:5
Nyckelord
architects, architecture, buildings, environment, environmental assessment tools, environmental sustainability, neighbourhoods
Nationell ämneskategori
Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknik
Forskningsämne
Planering och beslutsanalys
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-22522 (URN)978-91-7729-123-7 (ISBN)
Disputation
2016-10-21, Kollegiesalen, Brinellvägen 8, KTH, 09:30 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Tillgänglig från: 2016-09-28 Skapad: 2016-09-28 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-03-13Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Wallhagen, MaritaGlaumann, MauritzEriksson, OlaWesterberg, Ulla

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wallhagen, MaritaGlaumann, MauritzEriksson, OlaWesterberg, Ulla
Av organisationen
Teknisk miljövetenskapByggnadsteknik
I samma tidskrift
Buildings
Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknikArkitekturteknik

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1191 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf