hig.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the performance of LCC optimization software OPERA-MILP by comparison with building energy simulation software IDA ICE
Division of Energy Systems, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Division of Energy Systems, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik, Energisystem. Division of Energy Systems, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Building and Environment, ISSN 0360-1323, E-ISSN 1873-684X, Vol. 128, s. 305-319Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

From an economic point of view, it is crucial to minimize the life cycle costs (LCC) of buildings undergoing energy renovations, hence an optimization approach is needed. Building energy use and power demand as well as energy efficiency measures are important issues while performing an LCC optimization. Thus it is of great importance to accurately predict the building energy use and power demand before and after energy renovation. This paper aims to address the performance of an in-house LCC optimization software, OPERA-MILP, which has a rather fast optimization procedure. The aim is fulfilled through comparison with building energy simulation software IDA ICE before and after cost-optimal energy renovation. Three historic buildings with different layout and construction properties are used as a case study. The results show good agreement in the calculations of buildings’ power demand and energy use between OPERA-MILP and IDA ICE. The percentage difference in calculated annual energy use and buildings’ power demand with OPERA-MILP compared to IDA ICE is shown to be maximum 11% and 8% for the studied climate zones, respectively. Total impact on LCC is estimated to be equal to or less than 8%.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier Ltd , 2018. Vol. 128, s. 305-319
Emneord [en]
Building energy simulation, Energy renovation, Historic buildings, IDA ICE, LCC optimization, OPERA-MILP, Computer software, Electric power utilization, Energy efficiency, Ice, Integer programming, Life cycle, Building energy simulations, Buildings, computer simulation, construction method, historic building, life cycle analysis, numerical model, optimization, performance assessment, software
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-25837DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.012ISI: 000423004900027Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85037059457OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-25837DiVA, id: diva2:1167900
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Energy Agency, P31669-3Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-12-19 Laget: 2017-12-19 Sist oppdatert: 2018-03-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Moshfegh, Bahram

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Moshfegh, Bahram
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Building and Environment

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 196 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf