hig.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound?: A replication study
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Högskolan i Gävle, Akademin för teknik och miljö, Avdelningen för byggnadsteknik, energisystem och miljövetenskap, Miljövetenskap. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
2019 (Engelska)Ingår i: Memory & Cognition, ISSN 0090-502X, E-ISSN 1532-5946Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139-144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139-144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Psychonomic Society , 2019.
Nyckelord [en]
Auditory distraction, Individual differences, Replication, Serial recall
Nationell ämneskategori
Tillämpad psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-30572DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8PubMedID: 31363999OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-30572DiVA, id: diva2:1345327
Konferens
United States
Tillgänglig från: 2019-08-23 Skapad: 2019-08-23 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-08-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Personposter BETA

Marsh, John E.

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Marsh, John E.
Av organisationen
Miljövetenskap
I samma tidskrift
Memory & Cognition
Tillämpad psykologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 14 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf