hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nurses’ assessed self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis and their relation to structural empowerment, work engagement and work-related stress
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1712-6350
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science. Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1495-4943
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science. Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6738-6102
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1289-9896
2023 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 74, no 2, p. 501-513Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Nurses’ working conditions are important for their well-being at work and for their ability to provide patients with safe care. Self-efficacy can influence employees’ behaviour at work. Therefore, it is valuable to study self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis in relation to working conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between nurses assessed self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis in care situations and structural empowerment, work engagement and work-related stress.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study with a correlational design was conducted. A total of 417 registered nurses and licensed practical nurses at surgical and orthopaedic units responded to a questionnaire containing: the Infection Prevention Appraisal Scale, the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 and the Health & Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool. Correlational analyses and group comparisons were performed.

RESULTS: The nurses rated high levels of self-efficacy to medical asepsis in care situations. The correlational analyses revealed that correlation coefficients between structural empowerment, work engagement, work-related stress and self-efficacy to medical asepsis were 0.254–0.268. Significant differences in self-efficacy were found in the grouped working conditions.

CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that nurses rated high self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis and, to some extent, this seemed related to structural empowerment, work engagement and work-related stress. This valuable knowledge could enable improvements at the managerial and organisational levels, benefiting both nurses and patients in the long run.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press , 2023. Vol. 74, no 2, p. 501-513
Keywords [en]
infection prevention, working conditions, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-40325DOI: 10.3233/wor-211305ISI: 000939517200013PubMedID: 36314182Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85148963932OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-40325DiVA, id: diva2:1707228
Available from: 2022-10-31 Created: 2022-10-31 Last updated: 2024-10-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Healthcare personnel's working conditions relationship to risk behaviours for organism transmission
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Healthcare personnel's working conditions relationship to risk behaviours for organism transmission
2021 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background: Healthcare personnel (HCP) often experience undesirable working conditions. Risk behaviours for organism transmission can lead to healthcare associated infections and risk behaviours has been described to be influenced by working conditions. Research is lacking regarding HCPs working conditions and its relation to risk behaviours for organism transmission which this thesis aims to investigate. 

Methods: Study I had a mixed-methods convergent design. Observations and interviews were performed with 79 HCP, i.e., registered nurses (RNs) and assistant nurses (ANs). First-line managers were interviewed about the unit´s overall working conditions. The qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately and then merged. Study II was a cross-sectional study with 417 RNs and ANs. The questionnaire included: self-efficacy to aseptic care, structural empowerment (SE), work engagement (WE) and work-related stress (WRS). Correlational analysis and group comparisons were performed. 

Results: In Study I risk behaviours frequently occurred regardless of measurable and perceived working conditions. The HCP described e.g. staffing levels and interruptions to influence risk behaviours. In the statistical analyses, risk behaviours were more frequent in interrupted activities and when the HCP worked together. In Study II the HCP rated high levels of self-efficacy to aseptic care. Differences were found between self-efficacy and some of the grouped working condition variables and definite but small relationships were found between self-efficacy to aseptic care and SE/WE/WRS. 

Conclusion: The HCP rated high levels of self-efficacy to aseptic care, but on the other hand, risk behaviours frequently occurred irrespective of working conditions. Healthcare managers are responsible for HCPs work environment and should continuously work to promote sufficient working conditions and to increase HCPs understanding of risk behaviours, which consequently also promote patient safety.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Gävle: Gävle University Press, 2021. p. 51
Series
Licentiate thesis ; 13
Keywords
Working conditions, healthcare personnel, registered nurses, assistant nurses, risk behaviours, organism transmission, infection prevention, self-efficacy, mixed-methods.
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-37116 (URN)978-91-88145-78-9 (ISBN)
Presentation
2021-11-17, Zoom + Krusenstjernasalen 23.213, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
University of Gävle
Available from: 2021-10-21 Created: 2021-10-06 Last updated: 2024-10-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(106 kB)149 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 106 kBChecksum SHA-512
2f214e7f1cd0350c8f33c235cc7dd771e810a755961f4c2203ba1701f24b4fe2ef06e79532decad6233357691a529534248d56cba7b302b8b94f2fab0a7da28a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Arvidsson, LisaSkytt, BerniceLindberg, MariaLindberg, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arvidsson, LisaSkytt, BerniceLindberg, MariaLindberg, Magnus
By organisation
Caring Science
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 149 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf