hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Precision based guidelines for sub-maximal normalisation task selection for trunk extensor EMG
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2939-0236
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8245-7084
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, USA.
2017 (English)In: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, ISSN 1050-6411, E-ISSN 1873-5711Article in journal (Refereed) Submitted
Abstract [en]

Aim: The object of this study was to quantify the contribution of sub-maximal normalisation to the overall variance of exposure parameters describing erector spinae (ES) activity, and to provide guidelines for task selection which minimize methodological variance. Methods: ES EMG was measured from three locations (T9, L1 and L5 levels) on fifteen men performing a manual materials handling task in the laboratory on three separate days. Four repeats of each of eleven sub-maximal normalisation tasks (eight static, three dynamic) were collected, work data were normalised to each task and repeat, and exposure parameters calculated. The unique contribution of normalisation to the overall variance was determined for each task and exposure parameter using variance component analyses. Normalisation tasks were scored according to their relative contributions to the overall variance and coefficients of variation.

Results: A prone task, similar to the Biering-Sørensen test posture, was the most repeatable for all electrode locations and across all exposure parameters. Thoracic level normalisation typically showed poorer repeatability than lumbar normalisation.

Discussion: We recommend that future ES EMG studies employing sub-maximal normalisation utilise said prone task. An alternate normalisation task specific to thoracic level ES muscles may be warranted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017.
Keyword [en]
Exposure variability, variance components, low back, lumbar, erector spinae
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-23351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-23351DiVA: diva2:1067328
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-1761
Available from: 2017-01-20 Created: 2017-01-20 Last updated: 2017-02-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jackson, Jennie A.Mathiassen, Svend ErikCallaghan, Jack
By organisation
Occupational health scienceCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf