hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The noble art of demand shaping: how the tenacity of sustainable innovation can be explained by it being radical in a new sense
University of Gävle, Department of Business Administration and Economics, Ämnesavdelningen för företagsekonomi.
2003 (English)Conference paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

There's an enigmatic tenacity in sustainable innovation processes. I try to explain it by introducing demand shapingas a mirror process to the innovation process. In the literature on innovation it is often noted that it is impossible to plan radical innovation. Studies by economists and business economists alike have, however, mostly analysed those that are radical in a technological or economic sense. I introduce a third type of radicalness - radicalness in the demand shaping. Economists have had a hard time in appreciating this type of radicalness since they are seldom willing to rub shoulders with social anthropologists or sociologists.

Sustainable innovation processes often involve creative demand shaping since they presuppose dialogues that bridge huge distances of rationalities. Cases in point are when new or old social movements must interact with planners of infrastructure or R&D departments of TNC's in order to find (part) solutions for their sustainability demands. The complexity of the bridge building becomes even greater since the creative path breakers on both sides of the innovative user<->producer relation live very precarious lives in their respective organisations. Creativity is seen as threatening by the establishments of the organisations since new patterns of thought often devalue traditional competencies, networks etc.

Creative bridge building often takes place at protomarkets where path breakers from users and producers meet. Those producers - such as innovative industrial firms - who, through their "representatives" at proto markets, listen to the "weak signals" from new demand shapers will, however, often be punished for their receptiveness. This occurs if those who look like path breakers on the "user side", in my words new demand shapers, can not develop into representatives of the broader user side. Because the user side must have a rewarding capacity in relation to those producers that dare to venture into sustainable innovation processes. The rewards can take many forms but I summarise them with the term Dominant Demand. Successful demand shapers must thus be both small/flexible and big/resource rich. This is a dilemma for many sustainable innovations.

If, however, the many challenges are successfully met this will mean a lot for both sustainability and the actors involved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-23898OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-23898DiVA: diva2:1089473
Conference
Innovating for Sustainability, GIN2003 – 11th International Conference of Greening of Industry Network (GIN), San Francisco, CA, US, 12 – 15 October 2003.
Available from: 2017-04-19 Created: 2017-04-19 Last updated: 2017-04-19

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

GIN2003 Conference archives

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hollander, Ernst E.
By organisation
Ämnesavdelningen för företagsekonomi
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf