hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effekten av intuitiva och avsiktliga tankeprocesser på individers förutfattande meningar
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Psychology.
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

I föreliggande studie studerades hur individers förutfattade meningar påverkas av olika kognitiva processer, utifrån den kognitiva två-systemteorin. Syftet med studien var att undersöka om och hur System 1 och System 2-aktivering påverkade individers förutfattade meningar. Hypotesen var att System 1 aktivering gav större utrymme för förutfattade meningar att påverka individers bedömningar än System 2 aktivering. Designen var en 2 x 2 faktoriell design analyserad med en mixad ANOVA. Ett frågebatteri med frågor som aktiverade respektive betingelse (System 1/System2) användes som mätinstrument. Deltagarna var 40 studenter på Högskolan i Gävle. Resultatet visade på ett delvis stöd för hypotesen men får anses svagt med anledning av en interaktionseffekten mellan betingelserna.

Abstract [en]

This study examined how individuals' preconceptions are influenced by cognitive processes, based on the cognitive two-system theory. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether and how System 1 and System 2 activation affected individuals' preconceptions. The hypothesis was that System 1 activation allowed preconceptions to influence individuals’ judgement more than System 2 activation. The design was a 2 x 2 factorial design analyzed with a mixed ANOVA. A query battery, with specific questions to activate respective condition (System 1/System 2), was used as a measuring instrument. The participants were 40 students at Gävle University. The result showed partial support for the hypothesis, but may be considered as weak due to an interaction effect between conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , 18 p.
Keyword [en]
Predictions, Probability Assessments, System 1 and System 2, Two - System Theor y
Keyword [sv]
förutfattade meningar, sannolikhetsbedömningar, System 1 och System 2, två-systemteorin
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-24234OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-24234DiVA: diva2:1109859
Subject / course
Psychology
Educational program
no programme (freestanding course)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-06-21 Created: 2017-06-14 Last updated: 2017-06-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1330 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1330 kBChecksum SHA-512
ddfd6fb1931a1e4829801500ae989ca54135de9ab83c00cd370e354d2f8f770300cc1d967b19cb4f3d33d4cb007c2c08f10ff34e9ba53790a82ff3dcdc8a8593
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Work and Psychology
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf