hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of 2-D DIGE for skeletal muscle: protocol and repeatability
Department of Intergrative Medical Biology, Section for Anatomy, Umeå University, Sweden; Winternet, Boden, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. Umeå University, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Section for Anatomy, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Section for Anatomy, Umeå University.
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, ISSN 0036-5513, E-ISSN 1502-7686, Vol. 68, no 8, 793-800 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Proteomic analyses are powerful methods and have the potential to yield vast amounts of data. The available proteomic methods have been hampered by large methodological errors in quantification, due to large gel-to-gel variations. The inclusion of an internal standard greatly reduces this variation, and the purpose of this investigation was 1) to develop a sample preparation protocol for human skeletal muscle for 2-dimensional differentiated gel electrophoresis (DIGE) and 2) to investigate the repeatability of one such system, the Ettan™ DIGE. To test repeatability, nine aliquots from the same homogenate were labeled with 3 different CyDye™ dyes (Cy2, Cy3, Cy5). Samples were run on 18 x 24 cm gels, scanned with a Typhoon™ 9410 laser scanner and analyzed in the DeCyder™ software. When selecting spots only appearing in triplicates (N = 1314) the mean error was 1.7 % (SD: 10.5%; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4%). By setting the significance level to 99%, no false positive changes in protein volume ratios were detected. The protocol presented here used only 0.5 mg tissue and allowed the separation of > 2500 distinct protein spots in the pH range 3-11 and MW 10-200 kDa. Changes in protein abundance of < 20% can be detected. The method is especially useful when comparing muscle proteins between different conditions, for example: healthy and diseased tissue, before and after treatment or different exercise protocols

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 68, no 8, 793-800 p.
Keyword [en]
DIGE; Disease; Exercise; Human; Mass spectrometry; Skeletal muscle
National Category
Clinical Medicine Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-1960DOI: 10.1080/00365510802277464ISI: 000263221000019Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-57349141632OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-1960DiVA: diva2:118622
Available from: 2008-09-05 Created: 2008-09-05 Last updated: 2016-10-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hadrevi, Jenny
By organisation
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Clinical MedicineHealth Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 523 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf