hig.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Normative approaches to justice in physical education for pupils with physical disabilities: dilemmas of recognition and redistribution
University of Gävle, Department of Education and Psychology, Ämnesavdelningen för pedagogik.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2215-5850
Örebro universitet.
University of Gävle, Department of Education and Psychology, Ämnesavdelningen för pedagogik.
2009 (English)In: Disability & Society, ISSN 0968-7599, E-ISSN 1360-0508, Vol. 24, no 3, p. 331-342Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Seeking social justice in education for pupils with disabilities creates certain dilemmas. A ‘school for all’ means that educators are faced with a dilemma where the notion of ‘disability’ is perceived as ought not to matter, but where in actual fact it seems to matter very much! This article explores ways out of this general educational dilemma using the context of physical education (PE) for pupils with physical disabilities within the compulsory school as an example. Justice theories of resource distribution and cultural recognition affect educational outcomes, where demands are for justice and equity. Fraser’s (2000/2001) notion of ‘social status’, together with a pluralistic approach to identities where personal experiences are given a place, is used to suggest a solution to the dilemma. It is concluded that a redistribution of economic resources and social recognition is necessary if social justice within PE is to become a reality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 24, no 3, p. 331-342
Keywords [en]
identity, social status, disability, pupils, physical education
National Category
Pedagogy Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-2035DOI: 10.1080/09687590902789495ISI: 000265293300006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-74949110548OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-2035DiVA, id: diva2:118697
Available from: 2008-06-18 Created: 2008-06-18 Last updated: 2022-12-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Social rättvisa i inkluderande idrottsundervisning för elever med rörelsehinder: en utopi?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social rättvisa i inkluderande idrottsundervisning för elever med rörelsehinder: en utopi?
2010 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

 

The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the knowledgebase of inclusion and inclusive education and to outline possible consequences that may arise from an educational ideology of inclusion. The thesis describes a potential dilemma that is both theoretical and practical. The dilemma consists of, on the one hand, a need of identification and categorisation of specific groups in society in order to allocate and redistribute available resources, while, on the other hand, there is a need of social recognition of diversity in educational settings in order to achieve social justice and parity of participation. The inclusion of pupils with physical disabilities in the school subject of physical education (PE) is used as a particular example to illustrate a general dilemma. The specific aims were: i) to describe and apply a theoretical framework of ‘social status’ as a possible means of resolving the dilemma (study I); ii) to study PE teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive physical education (studies II and III); and iii) using a case study, to explore the experience of physical education through the eyes of a pupil with a physical impairment and his parents, classmates, PE teachers and personal assistant (study IV). Results show that Swedish PE teachers at primary school level are positive to inclusive PE for pupils with physical disabilities. Factors found to contribute to these positive attitudes were adequate training in inclusive education strategies, supportive school environments and personal resources. In a systematic review of international research PE teachers, in general, were found to have ambivalent attitudes to inclusive PE. This ambivalence was found over cultural borders among the 1200 respondents covered in the 15 articles reviewed and may indicate a latent awareness of the dilemma. Previous experience of having taught PE to pupils with physical disabilities, together with proper education in inclusion, mediated a more positive attitude. The case study of a 10-year-old boy with physical disabilities and significant others in his educational life proved to be a signal example of successful inclusion. Honneth’s three levels of social recognition were used in the analysis. Social recognition at individual, legal and value dimensions is a prerequisite for achieving social justice in inclusive PE settings. Finally, these findings, taken together, indicate a need to address social recognition and redistribution demands simultaneously in order to meet goals of equitable education for pupils with physical disabilities in inclusive PE teaching. Societal (external) and individual factors need to be combined when addressing the issue of social justice in inclusive education. A model of social status, developed by Fraser (2001; 2003), used in conjunction with the notion of plural identities is suggested as a possible resolution to the dilemma described in the thesis.

 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2010. p. 82
Series
Studies from The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, ISSN 1650-1128 ; 33
Keywords
social justice, recognition, redistribution, dilemma, physical education, inclusion, physical disabilities, teachers, social status, identity, attitudes
National Category
Pedagogy Social Work Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-6783 (URN)978-91-7668-726-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-24, Örebro, 15:14 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-05-27 Created: 2010-05-18 Last updated: 2022-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Jerlinder, KajsaGill, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jerlinder, KajsaGill, Peter
By organisation
Ämnesavdelningen för pedagogik
In the same journal
Disability & Society
PedagogySocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1005 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf