hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Task-based estimation of mechanical job exposure in occupational groups
University of Gävle, Belastningsskadecentrum.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University Hospital.
Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts.
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, ISSN 0355-3140, Vol. 31, no 2, 138-51 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the validity of a common belief in epidemiology with respect to work-related musculoskeletal disorders, that individual mechanical job exposure is better estimated from tasks performed in the job than from the mean exposure of the occupational group. METHODS: Whole-day recordings of upper trapezius electromyography were obtained from 24 cleaners and 23 office workers. Trapezius activity was analyzed in the level (gap time) and frequency (jerk time) dimensions. On the same day, the job of each person was divided into periods of active work and breaks by means of continuous observations. The bootstrap re-sampling technique was used with this database to compare task-based job exposure estimates with estimates based on the occupational mean. For a particular person, the task-based estimate was obtained by combining the average work and break exposures in the occupation with the personal time proportions of the two tasks in the job. RESULTS: The task-based estimates were, in general, equivalent to, or less correct than, occupation-based estimates for both exposure parameters in both occupations and for individual exposures, as well as for group means. This was the result in spite of significant and consistent exposure differences between work and breaks, in particular among the cleaners. CONCLUSIONS: Even if task exposure contrasts are large, task-based estimates of job exposures can be less correct than estimates based on the occupational mean. Since collecting and processing task information is costly, it is recommended that task-based modeling of mechanical exposure be implemented in studies only after careful examination of its possible benefits.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 31, no 2, 138-51 p.
Keyword [en]
Bias (Epidemiology), Biomechanics, Electromyography, Housekeeping, Hospital, Human Engineering, Humans, Muscle, Skeletal physiopathology, Musculoskeletal Diseases diagnosis epidemiology etiology, Occupational Diseases diagnosis epidemiology etiology, Occupational Exposure adverse effects statistics & numerical data, Office Management, Task Performance and Analysis
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-2864ISI: 000228618200008PubMedID: 15864908OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-2864DiVA: diva2:119526
Available from: 2007-11-28 Created: 2007-11-28 Last updated: 2014-11-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

PubMedfulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mathiassen, Svend Erik
By organisation
Belastningsskadecentrum
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 883 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf