hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Movement-dependent positioning errors in human elbow joint movements
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4556-2846
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Experimental Brain Research, ISSN 0014-4819, E-ISSN 1432-1106, Vol. 176, no 2, p. 237-247Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Healthy adult humans performed elbow movements in a horizontal plane under a small external extending torque (2.1-3.3 Nm). Test movements (TMs) consisted of slow ramp-and-hold flexions in the absence of visual feedback, with the target joint angle to be remembered from a preceding conditioning movement (CM). The CM was produced by matching two beams on the monitor screen: (1) command representing the target position (a straight line); and (2) a signal from the sensor of the elbow joint angle. Two kinds of CM were applied, which had the same target position (50 degrees in most experiments) but differed in initial positions: (1) fully extended joint (0 degrees, P1 CMs); (2) flexed joint (100 degrees, P2 CMs). In a group of 25 subjects, the target in TMs was usually overshot, with the position errors depending on the CMs: 2.7 +/- 0.6 degree (mean +/- SEM) for P1 CMs, and 10.9 +/- 0.7 degree (P < 0.001) for P2 CMs. Vibration of the elbow flexors substantially diminished the difference between the position errors, amounting to--0.31 +/- 0.5 degree and 2.33 +/- 0.6 degrees, respectively. It is suggested that the observed position errors resulted from after-effects in the activity of muscle spindles in agonist and antagonist muscles, but influence of differences in dynamic components of the afferent signals during oppositely directed approaches to the target cannot be excluded.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 176, no 2, p. 237-247
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-2876DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0612-6ISI: 000242335100005PubMedID: 16850321OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-2876DiVA, id: diva2:119538
Available from: 2007-11-28 Created: 2007-11-28 Last updated: 2018-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16850321&dopt=Citation

Authority records

Hellström, Fredrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellström, Fredrik
By organisation
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Experimental Brain Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1236 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf