hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the Disciplinary Affordances of Semiotic Resources
Uppsala universitet, Fysikundervisningens didaktik.
Uppsala universitet, Fysikundervisningens didaktik.
Uppsala universitet, Fysikundervisningens didaktik.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0303-3660
Uppsala universitet, Fysikundervisningens didaktik.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6409-5182
2014 (English)In: IACS-2014 Book of abstracts, 2014, p. 54-55Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the late 70’s Gibson (1979) introduced the concept of affordance. Initially framed around the needs of an organism in its environment, over the years the term has been appropriated and debated at length by a number of researchers in various fields. Most famous, perhaps is the disagreement between Gibson and Norman (1988) about whether affordances are inherent properties of objects or are only present when they are perceived by an organism. More recently, affordance has been drawn on in the educational arena, particularly with respect to multimodality (see Linder (2013) for a recent example). Here, Kress et al. (2001) have claimed that different modes have different specialized affordances. Then, building on this idea, Airey and Linder (2009) suggested that there is a critical constellation of modes that students need to achieve fluency in before they can experience a concept in an appropriate disciplinary manner. Later, Airey (2009) nuanced this claim, shifting the focus from the modes themselves to a critical constellation of semiotic resources, thus acknowledging that different semiotic resources within a mode often have different affordances (e.g. two or more diagrams may form the critical constellation).

In this theoretical paper the concept of disciplinary affordance (Fredlund et al., 2012) is suggested as a useful analytical tool for use in education. The concept makes a radical break with the views of both Gibson and Norman in that rather than focusing on the discernment of one individual, it refers to the disciplinary community as a whole. Put simply, the disciplinary affordances of a given semiotic resource are determined by those functions that the resource is expected to fulfil by the disciplinary community. Disciplinary affordances have thus been negotiated and developed within the discipline over time. As such, the question of whether these affordances are inherent or discerned becomes moot. Rather, from an educational perspective the issue is whether the meaning that a semiotic resource affords to an individual matches the disciplinary affordance assigned by the community. The power of the term for educational work is that learning can now be framed as coming to discern the disciplinary affordances of semiotic resources.

In this paper we will briefly discuss the history of the term affordance, define the term disciplinary affordance and illustrate its usefulness in a number of educational settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. p. 54-55
Keywords [en]
Affordances, Disciplinary affordance, Undergraduate Physics, Semiotics
National Category
Other Physics Topics Didactics General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Physics with specialization in Physics Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-28829OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-28829DiVA, id: diva2:1271202
Conference
The First Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, Lund, Sweden, 25-27 Sept 2014
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilAvailable from: 2018-12-17 Created: 2018-12-17 Last updated: 2022-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

bilaga(762 kB)116 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.pdfFile size 762 kBChecksum SHA-512
8fdc1a54d91c89e098034956f7d10c859e8ca9776c414d8d9389c9eea21b227249b8cc3d7388264fd5f63d85f1823b5ebd7206b9d2f24694e45fb9e768c89c88
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Book of abstracts

Authority records

Airey, JohnEriksson, UrbanFredlund, TobiasLinder, Cedric

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Airey, JohnEriksson, UrbanFredlund, TobiasLinder, Cedric
Other Physics TopicsDidacticsGeneral Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 514 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf