hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementation of the Swedish Guideline for Prevention of Mental ill-health at the workplace: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial, using multifaceted implementation strategies in schools
Karolinska institutet.
Karolinska institutet.
Karolinska institutet.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. Karolinska institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0161-160x
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 19, article id 1668Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Given today’s high prevalence of common mental disorders and related sick leave among teachers, an urgent need exists for a more systematic approach to the management of social and organizational risk factors within schools. In 2015, we launched the first Swedish occupational health guideline to support a structured prevention of these risks at the workplace. The existence of guidelines does however not guarantee their usage, as studies show that guidelines are often underused. Knowledge is therefore needed on effective implementation strategies that can facilitate the translation of guidelines into practice. The primary aim of the randomized waiting list-controlled trial described in this study protocol is to compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy versus a single implementation strategy for implementing the Guideline for the prevention of mental ill-health at the workplace within schools. The effectiveness will be compared regarding the extent to which the recommendations are implemented (implementation effectiveness) and with regard to social and organisational risk factors for mental ill-health, absenteeism and presenteeism (intervention effectiveness).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 19, article id 1668
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-31321DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7976-6ISI: 000511638300007PubMedID: 31829186Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85076374451OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-31321DiVA, id: diva2:1380001
Funder
AFA InsuranceAvailable from: 2019-12-18 Created: 2019-12-18 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bergström, Gunnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergström, Gunnar
By organisation
Occupational Health ScienceCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 170 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf