hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of a Weight Factor Method for Sustainability Decisions in Building Renovation: Case Study Using Renobuild
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Industri och samhälle, Byggteknik.
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, Energy Systems and Building Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9076-0801
Högskolan Dalarna, Akademin Industri och samhälle, Byggteknik.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9943-9878
2020 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 12, no 17, article id 7194Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Energy efficiency investments have become strategically important for the European Union. In particular, energy efficient renovation and investment in the existing building stock have become major challenges. Renovation of a building should involve a holistic and integrated design process, which considers all aspects of sustainability. The aim of this work is to suggest a mathematical model that weighs economic, social and ecological aspects into a measure that supports housing owners/decision makers to find the optimal renovation alternative from their perspective, taking factors such as budget, energy consumption, etc. into consideration. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) concerns structuring and solving multiple-criteria decision problems. MCDM has become popular in energy planning as it enables the decision maker to pay attention to all the criteria available and make the appropriate decision as per the priority of the criteria. In this study, the concept is introduced based on economic, social and ecological aspects assessed during a renovation project. A pedagogical example illustrates the suggested numerical system for comparing different renovation alternatives. The suggested method will facilitate decision-making processes in renovation projects and will allow decision makers to choose the best renovation alternatives that are in line with their business ideas and principles.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI , 2020. Vol. 12, no 17, article id 7194
Keywords [en]
building renovation; sustainability; multi-criteria decision-making; weighted sum method
National Category
Civil Engineering
Research subject
Sustainable Urban Development
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-33445DOI: 10.3390/su12177194ISI: 000570340400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85090425408OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-33445DiVA, id: diva2:1463947
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 40811-2Available from: 2020-09-03 Created: 2020-09-03 Last updated: 2025-05-19Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Enhancing the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Enhancing the Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Energy-efficient renovation of existing buildings has become a strategic priority for the European Union (EU) as part of its broader sustainability agenda. A key target is to achieve energy-efficient renovations in at least 3% of the EU building stock annually, with a strong focus on reducing energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and life cycle costs. To meet these goals, renovation efforts must adopt a holistic and integrated design approach that considers economic, social, and ecological dimensions of sustainability.

This work aims to enhance the decision-making process for sustainable renovation of district-heated multifamily buildings, with a focus on evaluating and selecting the most suitable renovation alternatives. This work provides a structured framework for evaluating and selecting the most suitable renovation alternatives. It presents a framework for both economic and environmental assessment of various renovation scenarios, considering the building perspective as well as the broader urban energy system perspective.

As a case study, the research examines a pilot renovation project involving several similar district-heated multifamily buildings, each equipped with different HVAC systems. The systems evaluated include: (1) exhaust ventilation, (2) mechanical ventilation with heat recovery, (3) exhaust ventilation with an exhaust air heat pump, and (4) combinations of exhaust ventilation with an exhaust air heat pump with photovoltaic (PV) panels. The findings indicate that there is no single optimal renovation scenario when viewed from both the building and urban energy system perspectives.

Furthermore, this work introduces a mathematical model based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), designed to support stakeholders in identifying alternatives aligned with their specific priorities, such as budget limitations, energy performance goals, and sustainability values, by systematically weighing various criteria.

Finally, a survey conducted among Swedish housing companies revealed a high level of awareness and engagement with sustainable renovation practices. While economic and environmental aspects are commonly assessed using specific metrics, the findings highlight a lack of standardized methods for evaluating social impacts, and emphasizes the urgent need for decision-making tools to guide future renovation projects in a sustainable direction.

Abstract [sv]

Energieffektiv renovering av befintliga byggnader har blivit en strategisk prioritet för Europeiska unionen (EU) som en del av dess bredare hållbarhetsagenda. Ett centralt mål är att uppnå energieffektiv renovering av minst 3 % av EU:s byggnadsbestånd årligen, med starkt fokus på att minska energianvändning, växthusgasutsläpp och livscykelkostnader. För att nå dessa mål måste renoveringsinsatser tillämpa en holistisk och integrerad designstrategi som tar hänsyn till ekonomiska, sociala och ekologiska hållbarhetsaspekter.

Detta arbete syftar till att förbättra beslutsprocessen för hållbar renovering av fjärrvärmda flerbostadshus, med fokus på att utvärdera och välja de mest lämpliga renoveringsalternativen. Arbetet presenterar en strukturerad ram för ekonomisk och miljömässig utvärdering av olika renoveringsscenarier, med hänsyn till både byggnadsnivå och det bredare urbana energisystemet.

Som fallstudie undersöks ett pilotprojekt där flera liknande fjärrvärmda flerbostadshus renoverats med olika ventilationssystem. De utvärderade systemen inkluderar: (1) frånluftsventilation med tryckstyrning, (2) mekanisk ventilation med värmeåtervinning, (3) frånluftsvärmepump samt (4) kombinationer av frånluftsvärmepump med solcellspaneler (PV). Resultaten visar att det inte finns något enskilt optimalt renoveringsalternativ som är bäst ur både byggnads- och energisystemperspektiv.

Vidare introducerar arbetet en matematisk modell baserad på Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), utformad för att stödja intressenter i att identifiera renoveringsalternativ som stämmer överens med deras specifika prioriteringar, såsom budgetbegränsningar, energiprestanda och hållbarhetsmål, genom att systematiskt väga olika kriterier mot varandra.

Slutligen visar en enkätundersökning bland svenska bostadsbolag att det finns en hög medvetenhet och ett aktivt engagemang i hållbara renoveringspraxis. Ekonomiska och miljömässiga aspekter utvärderas ofta med hjälp av specifika nyckeltal, men studien pekar på en brist på standardiserade metoder för att bedöma de sociala effekterna av renoveringsprojekt. Detta understryker behovet av heltäckande och enhetliga beslutsstödsverktyg för att vägleda framtida renoveringsprojekt i en hållbar riktning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Gävle: Gävle University Press, 2025. p. 76
Series
Doctoral thesis ; 62
Keywords
multi-family buildings, renovation projects, sustainable renovation, decision-making tool, social sustainability, life cycle cost, life cycle assessment, flerbostadshus, flerfamiljshus, renoveringsprojekt, hållbar renovering, beslutsstödsverktyg, social hållbarhet, livscykelkostnad, livscykelanalys
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-46738 (URN)978-91-89593-66-4 (ISBN)978-91-89593-67-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-06-10, B101, Borlänge, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-05-16 Created: 2025-04-09 Last updated: 2025-05-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1194 kB)4 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1194 kBChecksum SHA-512
038e2421aad21a32214c1599c7d7d34c1922610c49f183a414c91d5e48205e4d1122356e67867f257bb1990b30c87db6911749d15d6ffebedaee04204efaf717
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Akander, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Akander, JanMyhren, Jonn Are
By organisation
Energy Systems and Building Technology
In the same journal
Sustainability
Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 268 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf