hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Weighting power by preference eliminates gender differences
Lund University.
University of Konstanz, Germany.
Stockholm University.
Lund University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 15, no 11, article id e0234961Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Power can be applied in different domains (e.g., politics, work, romantic relationships, family etc.), however, we do not always reflect on which domains we have power in and how important power in these domains is. A dominant idea is that men have more power than women. This notion may be biased because the concept of power is associated with public life. We introduce the concept of preference-weighted power (PWP), a measure of power that includes different domains in life, weighted by the domains' subjective importance. Two studies investigated power from this perspective. In Study 1, participants generated words related to power, which were quantified/categorized by latent semantic analysis to develop a semantic measure of the power construct. In Study 2, we computed a PWP index by weighting the participants' self-rated power in different power domains with the importance of having power in that domain. Together the studies suggest that men have more perceived power in the public domain, however, this domain has a lower preference weighting than the private domain where women have more power than men. Finally, when preferences for power in different domains were considered, no gender differences were observed. These results emphasize gender difference in different domains and may change how we perceive men's and women's power in our society. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PLoS , 2020. Vol. 15, no 11, article id e0234961
Keywords [en]
Statistical weighting, latent semantic analysis, semantics, public domain
National Category
Economics and Business Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-34229DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234961ISI: 000591376200033PubMedID: 33151957Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85095768036OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-34229DiVA, id: diva2:1500092
Available from: 2020-11-11 Created: 2020-11-11 Last updated: 2021-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2487 kB)110 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2487 kBChecksum SHA-512
2a6acab8bb75e4f84387f4820f33bbbc6376f7ca163173f57338f97054de12c16876949adc6f1e9a1bcc3db2f521e7fd727272cc6ad11d1059dfaef9f6e89440
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Willander, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Willander, Johan
By organisation
Psychology
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Economics and BusinessComputer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 110 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 219 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf