hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The common understanding of simplification approaches in published LCA studies: A review and mapping
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, Environmental Science. KTH.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7401-4550
2021 (English)In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, ISSN 0948-3349, E-ISSN 1614-7502, Vol. 26, p. 50-63Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to investigate the common understanding of the variety of simplifications in LCA, by reviewing what simplification approaches are used in LCA research, and how these simplifications can be categorised. This may contribute to better sharing of LCA results for decision-making, through more transparent reporting, and with consistent terminology of simplifications in LCA.

Methods: The basis for this study is a systematic literature review of simplification approaches in LCA, including both previously published overviews of categories of LCA simplification approaches and LCA case studies using different simplification approaches. The PRISMA statement protocol (Moher et al., 2009) was used to minimize the risk of bias, increase scientific validity, and provide guidelines for conducting the review.

Results and discussion: The simplification approaches identified were grouped according to the element being simplified. Initially, six simplification approaches were identified based on previous categories. However, not all simplification approaches found in case studies fit into these six previously published simplification categories; these simplification approaches were therefore examined, and four additional categories were identified.The identified simplification categories were mapped and explained in terms of their role in the different stages of the LCA framework. Our results support the idea that simplifications in LCA are most often motivated by a lack of data. Most simplifications target the inventory analysis step, with an aim to reduce the inventory analysis effort.

Conclusions and recommendations: There is a need for a common simplification terminology and reporting standard. Due to the wide variety of purposes, scenarios, and products assessed, it is impossible to devise a one-size-fits-all approach for simplifications. Transparent reporting of simplification approaches used in an LCA study requires that they be described, the motivation for their use be explained, and their influence be evaluated; this will ultimately aid the study's audience in interpreting and comparing the results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2021. Vol. 26, p. 50-63
Keywords [en]
LCA, simplification, screening, streamlining, literature review
National Category
Environmental Engineering
Research subject
Sustainable Urban Development
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-34504DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01843-4ISI: 000595394200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097026299OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-34504DiVA, id: diva2:1506680
Available from: 2020-12-04 Created: 2020-12-04 Last updated: 2021-04-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2453 kB)839 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 2453 kBChecksum SHA-512
04754daa288b705b12cec45f4a0b76207836be64189059f919433a23bc57fd1c63260d6d23b3383796caf11ae716c7806c55c2954e9f8be5bfc92e8b1cb69176
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tasala Gradin, KatjaBjörklund, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tasala Gradin, KatjaBjörklund, Anna
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 839 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 257 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf