In this study, three different procedures: checkpoint RMS of residuals, statistical evaluation of AT results using t-test, and comparison of a photogrammetric digital surface model (DSM) and LiDAR data are used to analyse the effect of IMU and GNSS uncertainties on the final adjusted results. The outcome suggests that the method of block-wise GNSS shift correction is the better method for aerial triangulation and one should use appropriate observable weights in AT. The comparison of checkpoint RMS residuals between the two methods shows that the block-wise solution is on average 6cm more accurate than the strip-wise solution.