hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Visual Symptoms and Risk Assessment Using Visual Ergonomics Risk Assessment Method (VERAM)
Lund University, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5055-0698
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, Occupational Health Science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2091-6396
Swedish Work Environment Authority.
2021 (English)In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer Science and Business Media , 2021, Vol. 220, p. 729-735Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A visual environment impaired by e.g. glare can cause eyestrain, visual symptoms and musculoskeletal strain. A Visual Ergonomics Risk Assessment Method (VERAM) consisting of both a subjective questionnaire and an objective risk assessment, have been used at 217 workplaces, mainly computer work. VERAM can be used to examine and prevent deficiencies and increase wellbeing as well as detecting risks in the visual work environment and suggest measures that can be used to reduce the risks. The questionnaire showed that eyestrain, visual symptoms and musculoskeletal strain are common among Swedish workers. The overall risk assessments for glare and amount of illuminance on work surface are divided into three categories, green – no risk, yellow – risk, and red – high risk. Risk of glare and insufficient illuminance was present at 66% and 49% of the assessed workplaces, respectively. When the risk of glare and illuminance levels was rated as red, the frequency of the subjective strain was higher.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science and Business Media , 2021. Vol. 220, p. 729-735
Keywords [en]
Asthenopia; Eyestrain; Flicker; Glare; Headache; Illuminance; Neck pain; Temporal light modulation
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-35970DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_92Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106399710OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-35970DiVA, id: diva2:1561337
Conference
21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2021, 13 June 2021 - 18 June 2021
Available from: 2021-06-07 Created: 2021-06-07 Last updated: 2021-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Heiden, MarinaLindberg, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Heiden, MarinaLindberg, Per
By organisation
Occupational Health ScienceCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf