hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What value for whom? – provider perspectives on health examinations for asylum seekers in Stockholm, Sweden
Karolinska institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8358-1327
Karolinska institutet.
Karolinska institutet.
Karolinska institutet.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4698-5135
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 18, no 1, article id 601Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

In Sweden asylum seekers are offered a voluntary health examination, free-of-charge (HE). The HE coverage is low. The organization and implementation of the HE involves collaboration between different agencies with different roles within the provision of health information and service. This study aimed to assess their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators regarding implementation of the HE, as well as on the purpose, content and value of the HE.

Method

Thematic analysis of focus groups, individual and group interviews conducted between 2016 and 17 with 41 participants from various authorities and healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of HE in Stockholm.

Results

Suggestions were taken from interviewees of how to facilitate the uptake and delivery of HE through improved outreach to the target group with better collaboration, coordination and continuity between authorities. Apart from control of specific communicable diseases, the perceived ultimate goal of HE varied and was often vaguely formulated. Respondents desired better monitoring to assess the effects of HE and predict needs among asylum seekers. This included standardized procedures to promote equitable health care access and more explicit inclusion of mental health and other health dimensions in the HE.

Conclusion

There are several possible avenues for improving HE coverage and uptake. However, ambiguity exists concerning the benefits of such efforts given the uncertainty of the value of HE. Lack of available data on health status, determinants of health and impact of HE among asylum seekers emerged as barriers preventing optimal approaches for the assessment of health needs. Implementation of standardized guidelines, procedures and documentation would aid the understanding. A more holistic approach beyond infectious diseases is necessary. This would only be useful if there is value in screening for such conditions. More research is required to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HE and related screening policies in Sweden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2018. Vol. 18, no 1, article id 601
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-37992DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3422-1OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-37992DiVA, id: diva2:1639450
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2015-00304Stockholm County CouncilAvailable from: 2022-02-21 Created: 2022-02-21 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Marttila, Anneli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Delilovic, SaraMarttila, Anneli
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf