hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of life of older people in nursing homes in China – evaluation and application of the Chinese version of the life satisfaction questionnaire
Lishui University, China.
Lishui University, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2825-5657
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Science, Caring Science. Uppsala universitet.
Lishui University, China.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: BMC Geriatrics, E-ISSN 1471-2318, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 328Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Chinese and global populations are aging, and more older people are living in nursing homes in China. However, there is a lack of research measuring nursing home residents' quality of life (QOL), and especially associations with nursing home types (publicly versus privately run). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the construct validity and internal consistency of the Chinese version of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LSQ-Chinese) and determine the associations between nursing home types (publicly versus privately run), residents' sociodemographic characteristics, and their QOL.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey measuring QOL among older people living in nursing homes was conducted (n = 419). Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were used to assess the construct validity and reliability of the LSQ-Chinese. In addition, multivariate regression analysis was used to examine these associations.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit statistics for the seven-factor LSQ solution. All factors and the total scale had good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values > 0.70. The two factors with the highest QOL scores (higher scores indicate a more desirable state) were "physical symptoms" and "socioeconomic situation," and those with the lowest QOL scores were "quality of close-friend relationships" and "quality of daily activities fun". Residents living in privately run nursing homes had higher LSQ scores overall and for all factors except "physical symptoms" and "sickness impact" compared with publicly run nursing homes. Multivariate analyses indicated that marital status, number of chronic diseases, education level, main source of income, and nursing home type significantly contributed to the variance in the total LSQ scores. The associated sociodemographic variables differed between the factors, and the variable publicly versus privately run was significant for five of the seven factors.

Conclusions: The LSQ is a suitable instrument for measuring the QOL of Chinese nursing home residents. The total LSQ score was higher among residents in privately run nursing homes than in publicly run ones. According to residents' needs, staff should work for person-centered activities, and facilitate residents' social interactions with friends, as both these aspects were scored relatively low.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2022. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 328
Keywords [en]
Influencing factors; Life satisfaction questionnaire; Older adults; Psychometric testing; Quality of life; Residential living homes
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-38440DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03040-4ISI: 000782774200002PubMedID: 35428208Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85128303335OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-38440DiVA, id: diva2:1653286
Available from: 2022-04-21 Created: 2022-04-21 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(905 kB)86 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 905 kBChecksum SHA-512
c4af6dcaef40d350cfefcf814f9d4f41ca0a6bd4519d2243800cda4bc8bab7d2399c5107e77a2fefe31bfc5372f964bfefab23445637b5071baa98edc88fc377
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Carlsson, MarianneEngström, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Xu, LijuanCarlsson, MarianneEngström, Maria
By organisation
Caring Science
In the same journal
BMC Geriatrics
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 86 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 252 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf