Managed behavioral health care in the public sector: Will it become the third shame of the states?
2002 (English)In: Psychiatric Services, ISSN 1075-2730, E-ISSN 1557-9700, Vol. 53, no 2, p. 157-170Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Managed behavioral health care is increasingly being used in public mental health systems. While supporters cite potential benefits, critics describe dire consequences for individuals with serious, long-term mental illness. The situation has parallels with the major changes resulting from deinstitutionalization some four decades ago. Believing that analyzing history may prevent repeating some of its mistakes, the authors compare the antecedents, benefits, and negative effects of deinstitutionalization with those of the public-sector managed behavioral health care systems being developed today. Lessons learned from the earlier era include the need for careful general and technical planning; for assignment of responsibility, including monitoring, to the public sector; and for a focus on clients and the special needs generated by severe mental illnesses.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 53, no 2, p. 157-170
Keywords [en]
chronic disease, deinstitutionalization, disease severity, health care system, human, managed care, mental health care, review, United States, Consumer Satisfaction, Cost of Illness, Family, Homeless Persons, Humans, Institutionalization, Managed Care Programs, Mental Disorders, Mental Health Services, Public Health Administration
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-38572DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.2.157Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0036156983OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-38572DiVA, id: diva2:1659593
2022-05-202022-05-202022-05-20Bibliographically approved