hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative analysis of environmental, social, and governance disclosures
Fogelman College of Business and Economics, Crews School of Accountancy, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9889-9699
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Business and Economic Studies, Business administration.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2536-0446
Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
2023 (English)In: Global Finance Journal, ISSN 1044-0283, E-ISSN 1873-5665, Vol. 55, article id 100804Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We examine the level of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainability disclosure by firms between two regimes where disclosure is mandatory versus voluntary. We use the regulatory environment between the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to compare ESG disclosures. Firms in the US are currently under a voluntary disclosure regime. In contrast, EU members are under a mandatory disclosure regulatory regime that began in 2017. We find that EU firms outperform US firms under voluntary disclosure requirements (2007–2016), and the ESG disclosure of EU firms further improves relative to US firms after the implementation of the mandatory disclosure in Europe in 2017. Our results suggest that the 2017 adoption of disclosure guidelines in the EU is associated with improvements in EU firms' ESG disclosure. Our results regarding the value-relevance of ESG disclosure support a move toward mandatory ESG disclosures. Results support current initiatives that have been taken by global regulators and stock exchanges in recommending and requiring globally listed companies to disclose their ESG sustainability information to portray accurate and comprehensive corporate reporting. The results further our understanding of how firms from different institutional environment settings may have disclosed their ESG practices, thus providing opportunities for future research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2023. Vol. 55, article id 100804
Keywords [en]
ESG disclosure, Listed firms, Disclosure guidance
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-40723DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100804ISI: 000923699100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85147123455OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-40723DiVA, id: diva2:1725568
Available from: 2023-01-11 Created: 2023-01-11 Last updated: 2023-02-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Homayoun, Saeid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rezaee, ZabihollahHomayoun, Saeid
By organisation
Business administration
In the same journal
Global Finance Journal
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf