hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Overcoming the headwinds: Can policy design shape public acceptance of wind power in Sweden?
Uppsala Universitet.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, Environmental Science. Luleå University of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7584-2275
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, Environmental Science. Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2637-2024
2024 (English)In: Energy Research & Social Science, ISSN 2214-6296, E-ISSN 2214-6326, Vol. 16, article id 103674Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper explores wind power attitudes in Sweden, considering the proximity of wind power installations, using a large-scale survey (N = 5280). The study examines if attitudes were affected by policies that provide collective financial benefits through municipal tax revenues, personal benefits through direct compensation, or openings for democratic involvement. Only 15 % of the respondents expressed negative attitudes to wind power as a measure to speed up the transition to a fossil free society, while 26 % were negative to wind power built within 5 km from their homes. Attitudes were mainly predicted by ideological standpoints, environmental concern and political and governmental trust. The study found that for wind power constructed in the home municipality, respondents preferred collectively distributed financial benefits, while direct personal compensation offers the best prospects to influence ideologically motivated attitudes. None of the policy interventions tested in this study had any significant effect on respondents with strongly negative views.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2024. Vol. 16, article id 103674
Keywords [en]
Energy policy; Perceived fairness; Public acceptance; Renewable energy; Shifting policy aversion; Wind power
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Sustainable Urban Development
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-45207DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103674ISI: 001275545400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85198974831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-45207DiVA, id: diva2:1883335
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2021-00416Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research, DIA 2019/28Available from: 2024-07-09 Created: 2024-07-09 Last updated: 2024-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(483 kB)50 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 483 kBChecksum SHA-512
e54c4887253bb558108cd5f12e5d47e46a04af0a3bd496690a6936705e9809b8faf0776b3a8e31db24aeefebfa4416aa80d1870a66119513ea0655bc0532b246
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sörqvist, PatrikBarthel, Stephan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sörqvist, PatrikBarthel, Stephan
By organisation
Environmental Science
In the same journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 50 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 240 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf