hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Suffering from meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: experience and understanding of colonisation
Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden; Section for Caring Sciences, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6738-6102
Section for Caring Sciences, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Department of Caring Sciences and Sociology, Ämnesavdelningen för vårdvetenskap. Section for Caring Sciences, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1495-4943
2009 (English)In: Journal of Hospital Infection, ISSN 0195-6701, E-ISSN 1532-2939, Vol. 73, no 3, p. 271-277Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objective was to explore individuals' experiences and understandings of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation. Thirteen interviews were performed and processed using content analysis, resulting in the theme ‘Invaded, insecure and alone’. The participants experienced fears and limitations in everyday life and expressed a need to protect others from contagion. Moreover, they experienced encounters with, and information from, healthcare workers differently: some were content, whereas others were discontent. The described fears, limitations and inadequate professional–patient relationship generated unacceptable distress for MRSA-colonised persons. Thus, the healthcare sector should assume responsibility for managing MRSA, and healthcare workers must improve their professionalism and information skills, so as to better meet MRSA-colonised persons' needs

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 73, no 3, p. 271-277
Keywords [en]
Colonisation; Content analysis; MRSA; Qualitative research; Quality of healthcare
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-5334DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.002ISI: 000272033800012PubMedID: 19783322Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-70349819880OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-5334DiVA, id: diva2:234311
Available from: 2009-09-07 Created: 2009-09-07 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) an Unclear and Untoward Issue: Patient-Professional Interactions, Experiences, Attitudes and Responsibility
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) an Unclear and Untoward Issue: Patient-Professional Interactions, Experiences, Attitudes and Responsibility
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of the present thesis was to investigate experiences of living with multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB), using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization as an illustration, and to develop and validate a tool to describe healthcare personnel’s attitudes towards patients with MDRB. A further objective was to study MRSA-colonized persons’ and healthcare personnel’s experiences of patient-professional interactions and responsibilities for infection prevention.

Four empirical studies were conducted. A total of 18 MRSA-colonized persons and 20 healthcare personnel were interviewed regarding their experiences, and a total of 726 RNs responded the MDRB Attitude Questionnaire.

The findings revealed the difficulties associated with living with MRSA colonization, which was described as something uncertain, and as an indefinable threat that has to be managed in both everyday life and in contacts with healthcare. Interactions with healthcare personnel were described as unprofessional owing to personnel’s inappropriate behaviour and insufficient information provision. According to the personnel, achieving adequate patient-professional interactions required having knowledge and experiences of MRSA. They also experienced difficulties in providing tailored information to patients. The MRSA-colonized persons described their unwanted responsibility to inform healthcare personnel about the colonization, but also felt responsible for limiting the spread of infection to others. Furthermore, responsibility for infection control was regarded as shared between healthcare personnel and patients. The personnel described such responsibility as a natural part of their daily work, although it was not always easy to adhere to hygiene precautions. The MRSA-colonized persons felt that healthcare personnel have insufficient knowledge of the bacteria and of hygiene precautions. The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire showed that registered nurses do have knowledge deficiencies. The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties.

In conclusion, MRSA colonization constitutes a psychological strain for carriers, and interactions with healthcare personnel resulted in feelings of stigmatization. The present thesis indicates that there is a need to improve healthcare personnel’s knowledge, behaviour and emotional response in relation to patients with MDRB, in order to ensure patient safety and address patients’ needs. The heads of department is responsible for such improvements, and the MDRB Attitude Questionnaire is useful in identifying areas in need for improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2012. p. 74
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 741
Keywords
Attitudes of health personnel, colonization, hygiene, infection control, mixed-methods approach, MRSA, nursing care, patient-professional interaction, quality of healthcare, responsibility, The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-18925 (URN)978-91-554-8273-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2012-03-27, Universitetshuset, sal IX, Biskopsgatan 3, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-02-05 Created: 2015-02-04 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindberg, MariaSkytt, Bernice

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindberg, MariaSkytt, Bernice
By organisation
Ämnesavdelningen för vårdvetenskap
In the same journal
Journal of Hospital Infection
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1425 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf