hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): A pilot study
Växjö universitet. (SAMMI-study group)
Hälsohögskolan Jönköping. (SAMMI-study group)
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing science. Department of public health and caring sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. (SAMMI-study group)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1864-5777
Växjö universitet; University college of Haraldsplass, Bergen, Norway. (SAMMI-study group)
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, ISSN 0843-6096, Vol. 20, no 1, p. 16-21Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There is a need for a short and easily administered scale, in the Swedish language, for assessing partner relationship in the health care of persons with cardiac disease.

Purpose: To establish the reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS):

Design: The present pilot study has a methodological design.

Findings: Content validity has been tested for relevance, clarity and readability. The scale was tested for construct validity with explorative factor analysis. The reliability was tested by internal consistancy and test-retest analysis. The result showed a two-factor solution, which does not correspond to the original proposed one-factor solution. The factor analyses revealed two quite distinct factors of RAS, labelled "Relationship built on expectations and satisfaction of needs" and "Relationship built on love and devotion".

Conclusions: The scale has satisfactory psychometric properties in terms of content validity, construct validity, homogeneity and stability in a population of persons with cardiac disease. Vider evaluations of the RAS for other populations and settings are recommended. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 20, no 1, p. 16-21
Keywords [en]
relationship satisfaction, reliability, validity, factor analysis, cardiac disease
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health-Promoting Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-6399PubMedID: 20301858Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77950464474OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-6399DiVA, id: diva2:295974
Projects
SAMMIAvailable from: 2010-02-17 Created: 2010-02-17 Last updated: 2022-09-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

PubMedScopus

Authority records

Kristofferzon, Marja-Leena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kristofferzon, Marja-Leena
By organisation
Nursing science
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1327 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf