hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stretchability of the rectus femoris muscle: Investigation of validity and intratester reliability of two methods including x-ray analysis of pelvic tilt
Stiftelsen Alfta Kurhem, Alfta Rehab Center, Alfta, Sweden.
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, National Institute for Working Life, Umeå Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7543-4397
1993 (English)In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0003-9993, E-ISSN 1532-821X, Vol. 74, no 3, 263-270 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Validity and intratester reliability of two test methods designed to identify stretchability of the rectus femoris muscle (RFM) was investigated, combined with x-ray analysis of pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane. The first method is commonly used in clinical practice. The second is a new technique supposed to tilt the pelvis posteriorly and thus further separate the origin and insertion of the muscle. Investigation of validity and intratester reliability of the two methods was made by testing and retesting a random sample of 71 persons. The tests were performed with an equipment that automatically recorded the angle of knee flexion from a previously determined applied torque, indicating the end point of motion for that particular subject. Angle of knee flexion and subjective estimation of pain sensation due to stretch were recorded at each measurement. The pelvic tilt-analysis consisted of test-retest reliability of x-ray measurements, comparison be- tween the methods in both starting and final position, and x-ray and electronic goniometer measurements. All applied torques were measured with a strain gauge. Two out of three criteria of validity favored the new method and the third pointed out the two methods as equal. The two methods as well as the x-ray measurements showed high reliability, and the hypothesis of a more posterior tilted pelvis in the new method was confirmed. The electronic goniometer was less sensitive than x-ray, but proposed to analyse pelvic tilt clinically. Methodology procedures for joint angle measurements are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1993. Vol. 74, no 3, 263-270 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-7755PubMedID: 8439253OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-7755DiVA: diva2:355795
Available from: 2010-10-08 Created: 2010-10-08 Last updated: 2016-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

PubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björklund, Martin
In the same journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 1071 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf