hig.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
När kan suveränitet begränsas och en intervention vara rättfärdigat?: föreställningar inom Europeiska Unionens riktlinjer och ramverk.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Humanities.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

One of the big challenges for the European Union today lies in finding a common foreign policy for its 27 sovereign member states with their divided interests, experiences and traditions. New objectives set requirements on the Union to develop and intensify its military ability. The European Union´s view on when military force can be utilized sets concepts like sovereignty and intervention in focus. Can sovereignty be limited and if so can an intervention be justified? How did the Union argue regarding its participation in the intervention in Afghanistan, 2001? The Just War Theory gives the essay a normative framework against which to assess the Union´s view and guidelines for the use of military capabilities. An idea and ideology analysis examines the relevant documents and materials, and furthermore places them in their social context with the help of a critical discourse. The involvement in Afghanistan 2001 serves as a practical example of the Union´s foreign policy in matters of military force and its use. The European Union is shown to follow the Just War Theory and its criteria regarding sovereignty and just interventions. The practical definition adopted in Afghanistan also seems consistent with the theory´s framework.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 34
Keywords [sv]
det rättfärdiga kriget, GUSP, suveränitet, intervention, afghanistan
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-8303Archive number: HST11:01OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-8303DiVA, id: diva2:390532
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-02-17 Created: 2011-01-22 Last updated: 2011-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(549 kB)1236 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 549 kBChecksum SHA-512
31956a68d8a414f53c9e6c3913ea2946a196598baca356b2d9d46506f4d4286cb6817adfe6cbee974624ebbd580fb06856fcb164650863428993309a70d35a8e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1236 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 636 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf