hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Initial Report on the tolerance of legacy systems to transmissions of secondary users based on legacy specifications
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Electronics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Electronics. (Elektronik)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5429-7223
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Electronics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Electronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3860-5964
Aalto.
Ericsson AB.
2010 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Secondary use of exclusively licensed but inefficiently used spectrum bands has been proposed as a solution to make more efficient use of spectrum resources. An important requirement for such secondary usage is to ensure that the primary services and systems performance are not degraded due to the presence of the secondary system. In this report three licensed primary systems are studied, namely digital video broadcasting, radar and aeronautical systems. In this initial report, the odelled tolerance limits for the primary users are investigated and verified by means of measurements for the case of DVB systems and literature review for the cases of Radar and Aeronautical systems. The impact of interference is evaluated as a functionof Desired to Undesired Power level (D/U) ratio for DVB systems, the pulse detection error for Aeronautical systems and the maximum interference-to-noise ratio (INR) for Radar systems. The main conclusions are that co-channel and adjacent channel interference need to be taken into account when assessing the tolerance limits for secondary systems in the TV bands. Also, non-continuous bursty-type users do not cause any higher interference compared to continuous data traffic users; thus, same tolerance limits can be used for both traffic behaviours.

 

For aeronautical systems, spatial separation and transmit power of the secondary system determine the feasibility of secondary usage of the L-band. For other radar systems e.g. in S band and C band, the INR value, the spatial separation, the transmit power of the secondary system and the IF separation effects determine the possibilities for secondary users. For DVB systems, multiple interferers cause accumulative interference effects on the co-channels and adjacent channels, and the total amount of interference caused by multiple interferers should be kept below the desired signal level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 45
Keywords [en]
Adjacent Channel Interference, Co-channel Interference, Coexistence Feasibility, Desired-to-Undesired ratio, DME Distance Estimation, False Alarm Rate, Interference to Noise Ratio, Probability of Detection, Pulse Arrival Detection Error, Unaware Primary Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-8352OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-8352DiVA, id: diva2:393313
Projects
EU FP7 project INFSO-ICT-248303 QUASARAvailable from: 2011-01-30 Created: 2011-01-30 Last updated: 2023-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://www.quasarspectrum.eu/images/stories/Documents/deliverables/QUASAR_D3_1.pdf

Authority records

Björsell, NiclasHamid, Mohamed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björsell, NiclasHamid, Mohamed
By organisation
Electronics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1391 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf