hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explicit and implicit theories of change when designing and implementing preventive ergonomics interventions: a systematic literature review
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
2011 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, ISSN 0355-3140, Vol. 37, no 5, 363-375 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective In contrast to several previous papers dealing with the structure and effects of ergonomics interventions, this systematic literature review focuses on the theories concerning change processes upon which these interventions – implicitly or explicitly – have been based.

Methods In a systematic search of 13 literature databases, 30 peer-reviewed intervention studies published between 2000–2007 were identified that provided sufficient information for the change process theory to be identified.

Results Thirteen studies referred to an explicit theory of change, the most common being participatory theory, while in 17 studies, the change theory could only be discerned indirectly from the described intervention strategy. Twenty-five studies explained the reason for choosing their strategy, with a clear reference to theory or previous research, whereas five provided only a weak background. Four categories of intervention strategies for change were identified: (i) changes targeting the individual, (ii) changes focusing on the work environment, (iii) changes relying on interactions between people, and (iv) structural and organizational changes.

Conclusions A strikingly small proportion of ergonomics intervention studies have explained the theory behind the expected change process. A better awareness of the assumptions about change processes embedded in intervention strategies – whether implicit or explicit – may help in identifying and examining those ideas and processes that promote or restrict successful implementation. Such knowledge, in turn, can contribute to the development of interventions that are thoughtfully designed and effectively implemented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 37, no 5, 363-375 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-8584DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3159ISI: 000294593800002PubMedID: 21403982Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-80052569262OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-8584DiVA: diva2:404279
Projects
Ergopriset
Available from: 2011-03-16 Created: 2011-03-16 Last updated: 2014-11-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopushttp://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3159

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wijk, KatarinaMathiassen, Svend Erik
By organisation
Department of Occupational and Public Health SciencesCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 1096 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf