hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire: validity and understanding of responsibility for infection control in Swedish registered district, haematology and infection nurses
Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Country Council of Gävleborg.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Nursing science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1495-4943
Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Country Council of Gävleborg.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciencies, Uppsla University.
2012 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, ISSN 0962-1067, E-ISSN 1365-2702, Vol. 21, no 3-4, p. 424-436Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim. To assess the discriminative and construct validity of the Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire and to study registered nurses knowledge of, behaviour toward and emotional responses to patients with multidrug-resistant bacteria in relation to how they understand their own, managers and politicians responsibility for adherence to preventive measures for infection control. Background. Multidrug-resistant organisms are a global problem and an essential topic in healthcare regarding patient safety improvement. Design. Descriptive and correlational cross-sectional survey. Method. Data were collected in a non-random sample consisting of 397 registered nurses; district, haematology or infection registered nurses. One-way analysis of variance and independent t-tests were used for comparisons and a principal component analysis was performed. Results. Discriminative and construct validity were supported, as the infection registered nurses generally had higher scores on knowledge, behaviour and emotional response, compared with district registered nurses and haematology registered nurses and the three-factor solution was confirmed. Registered nurses with higher scores on knowledge and emotional response attributed greater responsibility to themselves and to politicians. The Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire was translated using a forward-back translation process. Conclusion. The questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties. Insufficient knowledge of, behaviour toward and emotional response to patients with multidrug-resistant bacteria were described, but the registered nurses did estimate their own responsibility for adherence to preventive measures for infection control as being great or very great. Relevance to clinical practice. There is a considerable need to improve knowledge, behaviour and emotional response regarding infection prevention measures among healthcare workers. The hospital management are responsible for such improvements and the Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Attitude Questionnaire is useful in identifying such needs, as it has adequate psychometric properties and is able to discriminate between groups. Evaluation among healthcare workers may indicate where to situate additional training, as this is of clinical significance for safe care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 21, no 3-4, p. 424-436
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-10038DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03914.xISI: 000298793400015PubMedID: 22150887Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84855352106OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-10038DiVA, id: diva2:439121
Available from: 2011-09-06 Created: 2011-09-06 Last updated: 2018-03-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) an Unclear and Untoward Issue: Patient-Professional Interactions, Experiences, Attitudes and Responsibility
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) an Unclear and Untoward Issue: Patient-Professional Interactions, Experiences, Attitudes and Responsibility
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of the present thesis was to investigate experiences of living with multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB), using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization as an illustration, and to develop and validate a tool to describe healthcare personnel’s attitudes towards patients with MDRB. A further objective was to study MRSA-colonized persons’ and healthcare personnel’s experiences of patient-professional interactions and responsibilities for infection prevention.

Four empirical studies were conducted. A total of 18 MRSA-colonized persons and 20 healthcare personnel were interviewed regarding their experiences, and a total of 726 RNs responded the MDRB Attitude Questionnaire.

The findings revealed the difficulties associated with living with MRSA colonization, which was described as something uncertain, and as an indefinable threat that has to be managed in both everyday life and in contacts with healthcare. Interactions with healthcare personnel were described as unprofessional owing to personnel’s inappropriate behaviour and insufficient information provision. According to the personnel, achieving adequate patient-professional interactions required having knowledge and experiences of MRSA. They also experienced difficulties in providing tailored information to patients. The MRSA-colonized persons described their unwanted responsibility to inform healthcare personnel about the colonization, but also felt responsible for limiting the spread of infection to others. Furthermore, responsibility for infection control was regarded as shared between healthcare personnel and patients. The personnel described such responsibility as a natural part of their daily work, although it was not always easy to adhere to hygiene precautions. The MRSA-colonized persons felt that healthcare personnel have insufficient knowledge of the bacteria and of hygiene precautions. The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire showed that registered nurses do have knowledge deficiencies. The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties.

In conclusion, MRSA colonization constitutes a psychological strain for carriers, and interactions with healthcare personnel resulted in feelings of stigmatization. The present thesis indicates that there is a need to improve healthcare personnel’s knowledge, behaviour and emotional response in relation to patients with MDRB, in order to ensure patient safety and address patients’ needs. The heads of department is responsible for such improvements, and the MDRB Attitude Questionnaire is useful in identifying areas in need for improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2012. p. 74
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 741
Keywords
Attitudes of health personnel, colonization, hygiene, infection control, mixed-methods approach, MRSA, nursing care, patient-professional interaction, quality of healthcare, responsibility, The MDRB Attitude Questionnaire
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-18925 (URN)978-91-554-8273-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2012-03-27, Universitetshuset, sal IX, Biskopsgatan 3, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-02-05 Created: 2015-02-04 Last updated: 2018-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Lindberg, MariaSkytt, Bernice

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindberg, MariaSkytt, Bernice
By organisation
Nursing science
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf