The essay “The art of learning and art in learning; difference between informative and integral learning” makes a difference between the level of representations and the dimension of structural possibilities. Informative learning, he claims, moves on the level of representations, whereas integral learning focuses on those structures and drives that shape the representations; the dimension of structural possibilities precedes the level of representations and structures it. Traditionally teaching and learning have made use of informative learning or, to use Freirer’s words, the banking education. The integral learning deals with the structural capacities of the mind, as they come to expression in the shaping of one’s world-view. Art, it is argued, expresses the first-forms of the mind-world or the self-world interaction; art is essential to learning.