hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measurement strategy and statistical power in studies assessing gait stability and variability in older adults
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, ISSN 1594-0667, E-ISSN 1720-8319, Vol. 28, no 2, p. 257-265Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Gait variability and stability measures might be useful to assess gait quality changes after fall prevention programs. However, reliability of these measures appears limited.

Aims: The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of measurement strategy in terms of numbers of subjects, measurement days and measurements per day on the power to detect relevant changes in gait variability and stability between conditions among healthy elderly.

Methods: Sixteen healthy older participants (65.6 (SD 5.9) years), performed two walking trials on each of two days. Required numbers of subjects to obtain sufficient statistical power for comparisons between conditions within subjects (paired, repeated-measures designs) were calculated (with confidence intervals) for several gait measures and for different numbers of trials per day and for different numbers of measurement days.

Results: The numbers of subjects required to obtain sufficient statistical power in studies collecting data from one trial on one day in each of the two compared conditions ranged from 7-13 for large differences but highly correlated data between conditions, up to 78-192 for data with a small effect and low correlation.

Discussion: Low correlations between gait parameters in different conditions can be assumed and relatively small effects appear clinically meaningful. This implies that large numbers of subjects are generally needed.

Conclusion: This study provides the analysis tools and underlying data for power analyses in studies using gait parameters as an outcome of interventions aiming to reduce fall risk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 28, no 2, p. 257-265
Keywords [en]
measurement strategy, gait variability, local dynamic stability, walking, between-day variance, within-day variance, healthy elderly
National Category
Neurosciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-12508DOI: 10.1007/s40520-015-0390-8ISI: 000372884600011PubMedID: 26050094Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84961208855OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-12508DiVA, id: diva2:542388
Available from: 2012-07-31 Created: 2012-07-31 Last updated: 2018-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Mathiassen, Svend Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mathiassen, Svend Erik
By organisation
Occupational health scienceCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Neurosciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1400 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf