hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Differences Between Chinese and Franch Companies Regarding Total Quality Management: A Case Study of JKKR Co., Ltd and Veolia Water Group
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

There is a research about the essences and processes of Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation and its effects on organization performance. The results from the research report indicate that the adoption of TQM in China is extensive (Yusuf, Gunasekaran & Guo, 2007). Although many Chinese manufacturing firms began to implement TQM from 1978 onwards, China still lacks effective TQM systems and applications at the business level (Zhao, 1995). TQM is an effective method to improve business performance. It is expected that quality management will help quality people in manufacturing firms and industries, not only in China but also in other developing countries.

This thesis aims to identify differences between Chinese and French companies regarding three of five cornerstones of TQM. They are customer focus, process focus and continuous improvement. The aim is to explain why differences exist and also examine how the companies are performing in TQM aspects as well.

In this thesis the authors follow a research design and collect data from interviews and documentation to provide the theoretical framework and obtain empirical evidence for the thesis.

Based on the findings, the authors compared the two companies regarding the three cornerstones. The reasons why there are the differences between the two companies are mainly social policies and the companies’ development stages.

From the study, the authors raised some new ideas of cornerstones. Compared with Gauttam (2010), who gave an idea of The Four Pillars of TQM, the authors think that the processes are as significant as the customers. Thus, the authors made a new theory model to state their understanding of the relationship between TQM cornerstones, which is a contribution to theoretical framework. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , p. 65
Keywords [en]
Total quality management, cornerstones (customer focus, process management, continuous improvement), management system, management approach, customer relationship
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-13350Archive number: TEX120430OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-13350DiVA, id: diva2:565259
Subject / course
Economics
Educational program
Industrial management and logistics – bachelor’s programme (swe or eng)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-11-19 Created: 2012-11-06 Last updated: 2012-11-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4197 kB)1114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4197 kBChecksum SHA-512
cdd66ce97d1a99ddd4ab64e97ebc60d2d713a1f67160414a3b0fd75989aa02398246cbc219062fc24bb1eb53a0e2f051845809062148213667b4784876fcd917
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
YANG, TINGTINGSHAO, YINGNAN
By organisation
Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1129 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 545 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf