hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lessons From a Concurrent Evaluation of Eight Antibullying Programs Used in Sweden
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden .
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Culture Studies, Religious Studies and Educational Sciences.
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden .
2013 (English)In: American Journal of Evaluation, ISSN 1098-2140, E-ISSN 1557-0878, Vol. 34, no 2, 170-189 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sweden has a low prevalence of bullying and Swedish schools are legally obliged to have anti-bullying policies. Many commercial programs are available. A mixed methods, quasi-experimental, concurrent evaluation of 8 programs, chosen from a pool of 21 widely used anti-bullying programs, was planned. Preliminary data, based on 835 stakeholder interviews, both individual and group, revealed extensive program-contamination in "treatment" schools (n = 31), and extensive program use in nominally designated control/comparison schools (n = 8). An evolved evaluation strategy focused on arrays of program components, use of which was assessed through detailed qualitative data gathered from principals, teaching and non-teaching staff, anti-bullying teams, and pupils. Bullying victimization, Grades 4-9, in 39 schools, was assessed by questionnaire, administered in three waves. Responserates were 76.1% (with N = 10,919) at the first wave, 74.3% (of 10,660) at the second wave, and

70.6% (of 10,523) at the final wave. Longitudinal aggregate and individual outcomes (3,487 pupils answered all three questionnaires) were assessed. Prevalence of victimization was 8.1% at first wave and (7.4% at last). Based on individual data, persistent victimization (bullied at both waves) was estimated at 1.5% with 4.7% experiencing a worsening situation (not bullied at the first wave but bullied at last) and 4.8% with an improved situation. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to designate intervention types (shared arrays of strong, weak, or absent component use) and schools with similar approaches. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal design with individual data and an aggregate cross-sectional follow-up indicated differences in effective, ineffective, and iatrogenic components, component clusters (intervention types), and successful schools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 34, no 2, 170-189 p.
Keyword [en]
hierarchical cluster analysis, program contamination, bullying prevention, Swedish schools
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-14297DOI: 10.1177/1098214012471886ISI: 000209634000002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84877096990OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-14297DiVA: diva2:622963
Available from: 2013-05-23 Created: 2013-05-23 Last updated: 2016-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gill, Peter Edward
By organisation
Department of Culture Studies, Religious Studies and Educational Sciences
In the same journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 904 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf