hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Indicators of healthy work environments - a systematic review
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2091-6396
Uppsala University, Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
2012 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 41, no Supplement 1, 3032-3038 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature and search for indicators of healthy work environments. A number of major national and international databases for scientific publication were searched for research addressing indicators of healthy work environments. Altogether 19,768 publications were found. After excluding duplicates, non-relevant publications, or publications that did not comply with the inclusion criteria 24 peer-reviewed publications remained to be included in this systematic review. Only one study explicitly addressing indicators of healthy work environments was found. That study suggested that the presence of stress management programs in an organization might serve as indicator of a 'good place to work', as these organizations were more likely to offer programs that encouraged employee well-being, safety and skill development than those without stress management programs. The other 23 studies either investigated employee's views of what constitute a healthy workplace or were guidelines for how to create such a workplace. Summarizing, the nine most pronounced factors considered as important for a healthy workplace that emerged from these studies were, in descending order: collaboration/teamwork: growth and development of the individual; recognition; employee involvement; positive, accessible and fair leader; autonomy and empowerment; appropriate staffing; skilled communication; and safe physical work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press, 2012. Vol. 41, no Supplement 1, 3032-3038 p.
Keyword [en]
Healthy work, healthy workplace, healthy organization, guidelines, employee well being
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-15376DOI: 10.3233/wor-2012-0560-3032ISI: 000306361803029Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84859863789OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-15376DiVA: diva2:650352
Available from: 2013-09-20 Created: 2013-09-20 Last updated: 2016-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttp://iospress.metapress.com.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/content/x773778mh8617l41/?p=dd92857b0a2a425799302b8a5d20aa36&pi=3

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindberg, Per
By organisation
Department of Occupational and Public Health SciencesCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 591 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf