hig.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exposure assessment in different occupational groups at a hospital using Quick Exposure Check (QEC): a pilot study
Work and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, CBF. University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7543-4397
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
2012 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 41, no Suppl. 1, p. 5718-5720Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In order to test the feasibility and sensitivity of the ergonomic exposure assessment tool Quick Exposure Check (QEC), a pilot-study was conducted. The aim was to test QEC in different occupational groups to compare the exposure in the most common work task with the exposure in the work task perceived as the most strenuous for the neck/shoulder region, and to test intra-observer reliability. One experienced ergonomist observed 23 workers. The mean observation time was 45 minutes, waiting time and time for complementary questions included. The exposure scores varied between the different occupational groups as well as between workers within the occupational groups. Eighteen workers rated their most common work task as also being the most strenuous for the neck/shoulder region. For the remaining five workers, the mean exposure score were higher both for the neck and shoulder/arm in the most common work task. Intra-observer reliability shows agreement in 86% of the exposure interactions in the neck and in 71% in the shoulder/arm. QEC seems to fulfill the expectations of being a quick, sensible and practical exposure assessment tool that covers physical risk factors in the neck, upper extremities and low back.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 41, no Suppl. 1, p. 5718-5720
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-16644DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0929-5718ISI: 000306361805194PubMedID: 22317663Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84859825987OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-16644DiVA, id: diva2:716720
Available from: 2014-05-12 Created: 2014-05-12 Last updated: 2020-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(112 kB)535 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 112 kBChecksum SHA-512
8a0797e030e236f141d98310220e6196dcda3edb0dacb50bce5591f1499bac2220013e30470bb10ef368b104522b2dc9a7533800d3f5b91350b05ffcc88793de
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Björklund, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björklund, Martin
By organisation
CBFCentre for Musculoskeletal Research
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 536 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 862 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf