hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Är det någon skillnad mellan arbetslösa och tillsvidareanställda i emotionsperceptionsförmåga och självkänsla?
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Psychology.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Psychology.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Syftet med studien var att undersöka om människor som deltar i någon form av arbetsmarknadsåtgärd är mer benägna att tolka andras emotionella uttryck som mer negativa i jämförelse med tillsvidareanställda, samt att undersöka om det fanns någon skillnad i självskattad självkänsla mellan grupperna. I studien deltog 28 individer varav 14 ingick i en undersökningsgrupp och 14 i en kontrollgrupp. Alla deltagare genomförde ett databaserat emotionsperceptionstest samt besvarade en enkät där de fick skatta sin självkänsla. Studiens resultat visade att det inte uppstod någon signifikant interaktionseffekt mellan variablerna grupp och uttryck som stämde överens med hypotesen, men det fanns en tendens till skillnad i självskattad självkänsla, där kontrollgruppen skattade sin självkänsla högre. Diskussionen bestod av resonemang kring varför en interaktionseffekt inte uppstod, där den största orsaken tros vara att spridningen i deltagarnas data var begränsad. 

Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to examine whether people who participate in employment measures are more likely to interpret emotional expressions of other people as more negative compared to permanent employees, and to examine whether there was any difference in self-rated self-esteem between the groups. The study consisted of 28 people, with 14 in an experimental group and 14 in a control group. All participants completed a computerized emotion perception test and answered a questionnaire in which they had to rate their self-esteem. The results of this study didn’t show a significant interaction effect between the variables group and expression that were consistent with the hypothesis, but there was a trend toward a difference in self-rated self-esteem, where the control group rated their self-esteem higher. The discussion consisted of arguments why an interaction effect didn’t occur, and the major cause was probably the size of distribution. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , p. 13
Keywords [sv]
Arbetsmarknadsåtgärd, emotionella uttryck, tillsvidareanställda, självkänsla
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-16921Archive number: SGPAK-v14-29OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-16921DiVA, id: diva2:725047
Subject / course
Psychology
Educational program
Human resources and labour relations
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-06-16 Created: 2014-06-14 Last updated: 2014-06-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(558 kB)144 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 558 kBChecksum SHA-512
1ee634d40e61a5b74fd15233cc8e78cf317d579cabad512c32793bbdf677039c3bbda32e467225fb4eb2c23a0874d3dd997f45e696d4115f0f2d7865d09eca0f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Work and Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 144 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf