hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Co-ordination of spatial perspectives in response to addressee feedback: Effects of perceived addressee understanding
University of Bremen.
University of Bremen.
2012 (English)In: Pragmatics and cognition, ISSN ISSN 0929-0907, Vol. 20, no 3, 505-545 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper we investigate the effect of level of understanding revealed by feedback in the form of clarification requests from a route follower on a route giver’s spatial perspective choice in their response in route instruction dialogues. In an experiment varying the level of understanding displayed by route follower clarification requests (the independent variable), route giver perspective switching in response to this feedback is investigated. Three levels of understanding displayed by feedback are investigated: (1) low-level clarification requests indicating that the instruction was not processed, (2) semantic-level clarification requests indicating that the spatial direction given in the instruction could not be resolved as the speaker of the clarification request could not interpret which perspective was intended, and (3) high-level feedback which indicates that the route giver’s instruction was understood but which note an obstacle to following the instruction. Results show that perspective choice, which is a conceptual feature of language use, is sensitive to perceived level of addressee understanding. We found that route givers consistently switch perspectives in responding to semantic-level clarification requests but not in response to low-level ones, and also that switching occurs more for high-level feedback than for low-level feedback. We address how dialogue systems can take advantage of these findings by modelling our results in an Information State model of dialogue, presenting update rules for response generation which account for our findings and also update rules which enable generation of the feedback themselves.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 20, no 3, 505-545 p.
Keyword [en]
co-ordination in dialogue, spatial language, feedback, dialogue modelling
National Category
Specific Languages Interaction Technologies Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-18230DOI: 10.1075/pc.20.3.04thoISI: 000323562100004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84878293757OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-18230DiVA: diva2:767298
Projects
DiaSpace
Available from: 2014-12-01 Created: 2014-12-01 Last updated: 2016-02-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thomas, Kavita Elisheba
Specific LanguagesInteraction TechnologiesApplied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 568 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf