hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diskrepansen mellan läromedel och styrdokument i Religionskunskap: En jämförelse mellan läroböcker och styrdokument i Religionskunskap på gymnasienivå
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Educational sciences.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Educational sciences.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Med utgångspunkt i en analysmetod framtagen av The American Association of the Advancement of Science (AAAS) utfördes en läromedelsanalys på två separata utgåvor av ett läromedel författade av Birgitta Thulin och Sten Elm (Religion 1, utgiven 2010 och Religion 1 & 2, specialisering, utgiven 2013). Undersökningen gjordes för att söka svar på följande frågor: 1) Vad står det i ämnesplanen för grundkursen religionskunskap? 2) Vad står i motsvarande läromedel? 3) Hur skiljer sig de två undersökta utgåvorna? 4) Hur väl överensstämmer styrdokument och böcker med varandra?

Analysen av materialet upptäckte att det finns en betydande diskrepans mellan innehållet i båda de undersökta böckerna, i jämförelse med styrdokumentets centrala innehåll. 

Abstract [en]

With base in an analytic method developed by The American Association of the Advancement of Science (AAAS) a learning material analysis was performed on two separate editions of a book written by Birgitta Thulin and Sten Elm (Religion 1, published 2010 and Religion 1 & 2, specialisering, published 2013). The investigation was carried out to search for answers regarding the following questions: 1) What is said in the syllabus, for the first course in religion? 2) What is said in matching learning materials? 3) How much do the two investigated editions differ? 4) How well does syllabus and learning materials match?

The analysis of the material discovered that there is a considerable discrepancy between the content in the investigated books, in comparison to the central goals of curriculum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014.
Keyword [sv]
Religionskunskap, diskrepans, läromedel, styrdokument, AAAS, GY11
National Category
Religious Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-18740Archive number: RV1:20/2014OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-18740DiVA: diva2:779672
Subject / course
Religious studies education
Educational program
Education – upper secondary school
Presentation
2014-10-29, 13:15 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-01-13 Created: 2015-01-13 Last updated: 2015-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Diskrepansen mellan läromedel och styrdokument i Religionskunskap(598 kB)245 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 598 kBChecksum SHA-512
1833532d2958692c1d8f83982dea00a35ca9d42368c68be46f8b09662c63119f723584d76ab200567b45e6c6f816b990ff3b77d92c043f72d382544127bad397
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Educational sciences
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 245 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf