hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Distraction of Counting by the Meaning of Background Speech: Are Spatial Memory Demands a Prerequisite?
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering. (Miljöpsykologi)
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering. School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire UK . (Miljöpsykologi)
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering. Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. (Miljöpsykologi)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7584-2275
2015 (English)In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, ISSN 0888-4080, E-ISSN 1099-0720, Vol. 29, no 4, 584-591 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper reexamines the effects of background speech on counting. Previous studies have shown that background sound disrupts counting in comparison with silence, but the magnitude of disruption is no larger for spoken numbers compared with that for non-number speech (there is no effect of the meaning of background speech). The typical task used previously has been to count the number of sequentially presented visual events. We replicated the general finding in Experiment 1—that there is no effect of the meaning of background speech—in the context of the classic sequence counting task. In Experiment 2, the task was changed by having to-be-counted dots presented simultaneously and randomly across the visual field. Here, an effect attributable to the meaning of background speech emerged. Background speech that is similar in meaning to the focal task process contributes to the magnitude of disruption, but apparently only when spatial memory processes are a task prerequisite.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 29, no 4, 584-591 p.
Keyword [en]
background speech, disruption, interferance, short-term memory, working-memory, auditory distraction
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-19277DOI: 10.1002/acp.3141ISI: 000358004500010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84947490353OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-19277DiVA: diva2:809416
Available from: 2015-05-04 Created: 2015-05-04 Last updated: 2015-12-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljung, RobertMarsh, John E.Sörqvist, Patrik
By organisation
Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering
In the same journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 642 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard-cite-them-right
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • sv-SE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • de-DE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf