hig.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can cognitive inferences be made from aggregate traffic flow data?
Department of Geography and Human Environment, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2337-2486
2015 (English)In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, ISSN 0198-9715, E-ISSN 1873-7587, Vol. 54, 219-229 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract Space syntax analysis or the topological analysis of street networks has illustrated that human traffic flow is highly correlated with some topological centrality measures, implying that human movement at an aggregate level is primarily shaped by the underlying topological structure of street networks. However, this high correlation does not imply that any individual's movement can be predicted by any street network centrality measure. In other words, traffic flow at the aggregate level cannot be used to make inferences about an individual's spatial cognition or conceptualization of space. Based on a set of agent-based simulations using three types of moving agents – topological, angular, and metric – we show that topological–angular centrality measures correlate better than does the metric centrality measure with the aggregate flows of agents who choose the shortest angular, topological or metric routes. We relate the superiority of the topological–angular network effects to the structural relations holding between street network to-movement and through-movement potentials. The study findings indicate that correlations between aggregate flow and street network centrality measures cannot be used to infer knowledge about individuals' spatial cognition during urban movement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 54, 219-229 p.
Keyword [en]
Urban movement, Cognitive distance, Network analysis, Space syntax, Agent-based simulation
National Category
Computer and Information Science Social and Economic Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-20371DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.005ISI: 000368306700019ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84941906554OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-20371DiVA: diva2:858604
Available from: 2015-10-02 Created: 2015-10-02 Last updated: 2016-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jiang, Bin
By organisation
Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management
In the same journal
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
Computer and Information ScienceSocial and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 355 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf