hig.sePublications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Differences in motor variability among individuals performing a standardized short-cycle manual task
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9327-6177
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5055-0698
University of Gävle, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Occupational health science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1443-6211
2017 (English)In: Human Movement Science, ISSN 0167-9457, E-ISSN 1872-7646, Vol. 51, 17-26 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Motor variability (MV) has been suggested to be a determinant of the risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders in repetitive work. In this study we examined whether individuals consistently differed in the extent of motor variability when performing a standardized short-cycle manual task. On three separate days, arm kinematics was recorded in 14 healthy subjects performing a pipetting task, transferring liquid from a pick-up tube to eight target tubes with a cycle time of 2.8 s. Cycle-to-cycle standard deviations (SD) of a large selection of shoulder and elbow kinematic variables, were processed using principal component analysis (PCA). Thereafter, between-subjects and between-days (within-subject) variance components were calculated using a random effects model for each of four extracted principal components. The results showed that MV differed consistently between subjects (95% confidence intervals of the between-subjects variances did not include zero) and that subjects differed consistently in MV between days. Thus, our results support the notion that MV may be a consistent personal trait, even though further research is needed to verify whether individuals rank consistently in MV even across tasks. If so, MV may be a candidate determinant of the risk of developing fatigue and musculoskeletal disorders in repetitive occupational work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 51, 17-26 p.
Keyword [en]
Kinematics, Repetitive task, Principal component analysis, Day-to-day variability, Between-subjects variability, Individual differences
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-21889DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.009PubMedID: 27821310ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84994052099OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-21889DiVA: diva2:942376
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009–1761Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-0103Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2011–0075
Available from: 2016-06-23 Created: 2016-06-23 Last updated: 2016-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandlund, JonasSrinivasan, DivyaHeiden, MarinaMathiassen, Svend Erik
By organisation
Centre for Musculoskeletal ResearchOccupational health science
In the same journal
Human Movement Science
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 141 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link